RE: Apache on Win2k - WAS: win 2000 professional for web server?

2003-03-04 Thread Benjamin S. Rogers
> I use serv-U for my FTP accounts. In IIS it seems to > require a unique port number for each FTP account Umm, only if you configure it that way. :) If each FTP site has it's own IP address there is no reason that they can't all use the same port. Even if you run all your FTP sites on the same I

Re: Apache on Win2k - WAS: win 2000 professional for web server?

2003-03-04 Thread Jochem van Dieten
samcfug wrote: > > I use serv-U for my FTP accounts. In IIS it seems to require a unique port > number for each FTP account IIS does not require unique port numbers. Jochem ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/in

RE: Apache on Win2k - WAS: win 2000 professional for web server?

2003-03-04 Thread Barney Boisvert
tts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 1:15 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Apache on Win2k - WAS: win 2000 professional for web > server? > > > > How well does Apache run on Win 2k? I'm running > > into issues w/ IIS & FTP sites for my v

Re: Apache on Win2k - WAS: win 2000 professional for web server?

2003-03-04 Thread samcfug
= - Original Message - From: "Scott Wilhelm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 2:57 PM Subject: Apache on Win2k - WAS: win 2000 professional for web server? | How well does Apache

RE: Apache on Win2k - WAS: win 2000 professional for web server?

2003-03-04 Thread Dave Watts
> How well does Apache run on Win 2k? I'm running > into issues w/ IIS & FTP sites for my virtual > directories, and I'm hoping that Apache might > work better for me. It seems to work well enough for me - but I'm not putting it under any load, either. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://

Apache on Win2k - WAS: win 2000 professional for web server?

2003-03-04 Thread Scott Wilhelm
How well does Apache run on Win 2k? I'm running into issues w/ IIS & FTP sites for my virtual directories, and I'm hoping that Apache might work better for me. Any comments? Scott > -Original Message- > From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:55 PM >