Looks like you missed/not read several of the posts, as has been mentioned
previously there is now a simple installer by Jordan Michaels that installs
Railo with tomcat.
It will probably never be quite as idiot proof as CF because of JRUN and its
custom connector which negates the need to do addit
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:49 PM, UXB wrote:
>>> . 3.2 will also see the Vivio installers become the official Railo
>>> installers so folks who like simple "click-click-done" installers
> This, the lack of simple installation, in my opinion is the biggest
> impediment to attracting new people to t
It sounds like it's a first impression problem. Which is ironically what CF
has suffered from since day one. Many still scoff at CF based on a first
impression they got about it in the 90's or early 00's. Sadly people who
have tried it and been disappointed (be it CF, Railo or whatever
else) aren'
cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
> Subject: Re: What Notable Differences are there between Railo, Open
> Bluedragon, and Adobe Coldfusion? [Stackoverflow.com]
> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:10:19 -0500
> From: mgr...@modus.bz
>
>
> It sounds like it's a first impression problem
. Any ideas?
John Burns
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Wyle Laboratories, Inc. | Web Developer
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 12:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: 5th Most Trafficked Site Switches to BlueDragon
> On this topic of ranking the major sites, does anyone have any idea how
> Alexa and some of the other listings come up with these rankings? I
> have a client of mine who went to alexa and did a search for his domain
> and came back telling me that their site is in the X% of the websites in
> the
s?
>
>
> John Burns
> Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
> Wyle Laboratories, Inc. | Web Developer
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 12:18 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE:
Any ideas what might be causing these BlueDragon errors?
_
Failed to read command byte from ServletExec.
AND
Failed to connect to ServletExec.
Group = default
Address = 127.0.0.1:
The error number is 10061
_
I've looked in the log files and have
ion of it in:
> Java Performance Tuning published by O'Reilly.
> In general, you should not use try / catch for flow control.
> hope that helps...
> mike chambers
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday, Oct 15, 2002, at 07:51 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
> I suppose I should clarify by saying that I haven't simply disregarded
> the
> original intent of all-together. I do use it mostly for error
> handling, although much of it is for custom error handling, such as
> server
> s
>> There have been a handful ( maybe a half dozen )
>> situations where I found
>> the was extremely helpful in creating an easily
>> human read/writeable
>> codeblock where the only alternative I could think of
>> would have been a horrible mess of spaghetti code.
> Yes, that is true. There are
On Tuesday, Oct 15, 2002, at 17:26 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
> Isaac the Butcher of Fusion ... :)
Careful, that might stick! :)
[horrific factorial implemented with try/catch snipped]
> Of course not... For starters, there are existing UDF's on cflib.org to
> handle factorials. :P And I
> On Tuesday, Oct 15, 2002, at 17:26 US/Pacific, S. Isaac
> Dealey wrote:
>> Isaac the Butcher of Fusion ... :)
> Careful, that might stick! :)
At least then I'd be assured a reputation. :)
> [horrific factorial implemented with try/catch snipped]
>> Of course not... For starters, there are exi
On Wednesday, Oct 16, 2002, at 06:13 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
>> [horrific factorial implemented with try/catch snipped]
> Yech... I pitty your server. :P
My Mac laptop, you mean? :)
In answer to Kola's question about try-catch in CF5: try-catch
generally introduces an overhead in eve
901 - 914 of 914 matches
Mail list logo
