Jacob Wrote:
> Would those socket gateways be configured in the Event Gateways
> section?
> If so, isn't that only available in CF enterprise edition? I'm not
> saying this is bad, I'm just curious.
True. But you could always use another socket server there are plenty XML
Socket servers. Or wri
> Now that's cool to know. That's either really good design on Arjun's
> part or pure luck, since, as far as I can tell, ajaxCFC uses WDDX and
> the CFWDDX tag to write the JS that gets written to the browser (which
> is a really good choice btw) and CFAJAX uses other code. I'm going to
> have to e
Now that's cool to know. That's either really good desing on Arjun's
part or pure luck, since, as far as I can tell, ajaxCFC uses WDDX and
the CFWDDX tag to write the JS that gets written to the browser (which
is a really good choice btw) and CFAJAX uses other code. I'm going to
have to examine thi
Would those socket gateways be configured in the Event Gateways section?
If so, isn't that only available in CF enterprise edition? I'm not
saying this is bad, I'm just curious.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Strong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 7:07 PM
>
And by the way, a lot of James's documentation for CFAjax works for
ajaxCFC as well. Particularly the data types stuff.
> -Original Message-
> From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 5:24 PM
>
> I did this because the docs weren't being actively deve
If your using AjaxCFC by rob gonda, you need cfadmin access only if you need to
configure and use socket gateways for realtime socket driven data updates.
He's doing some wonderful things with sockets.
~|
Message: http://www.hou
I did this because the docs weren't being actively developed :-)
On 6/7/06, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > James isn't the developer of CFAJAX, Arjun Kalura is. I suppose he's
> > the only one who could definitively say that CFAjax isn't being actively
> > developed, but the lates
By the way, ajaxCFC /is/ being actively developed. The latest release
was yesterday.
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 11:36 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CF, Ajax and shared hosting.
>
> > J
I have made only tentative steps into uing AJAX but i found this
implementation to be the easiest to use http://www.lalabird.com/
On 6/6/06, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > James isn't the developer of CFAJAX, Arjun Kalura is. I suppose he's
> > the only one who could definitivel
> James isn't the developer of CFAJAX, Arjun Kalura is. I suppose he's
> the only one who could definitively say that CFAjax isn't being actively
> developed, but the latest release (1.3) is over 6 months old.
Oops...must have got my wires crossed...James always has the CFAJAX stuff in
his
sig.
Bryan Stevenson wrote:
> So Jamesis Rick correct and you are no longer actively developing CFAJAX?
James isn't the developer of CFAJAX, Arjun Kalura is. I suppose he's
the only one who could definitively say that CFAjax isn't being actively
developed, but the latest release (1.3) is over 6
So Jamesis Rick correct and you are no longer actively developing CFAJAX?
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.electricedgesystems.com
~~
And to top it off, some f$%#ing a^*hole keeps vandalising the CFAJAX wiki.
Theoretically we should be able to rip suggest and other components
from CFAJAX and put them to work with ajaxCFC, which I'm going to try
for my next project.
On 6/6/06, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You definatel
You definately DO NOT need mappings or anything for ajaxCFC.
You can put "ajax.cfc" right in the same directory as your app.
REGARDING CFAJAX...
I'm gonna keep saying this until it's not true anymore:
#1 - CFAJAX doesn't work well with Safari.
#2 - there are nasty security issues with CFAJAX th
> Re CFAjax, you don't have to hard code urls into the js now.
> For some
> reason in the examples he hardcodes the urls, but it is not necessary.
>
> I thought that because AjaxCFC uses cfcs you would need to
> define a cf
> mapping in administrator to point to your cfcs, is that not the cas
Josh
- Original Message -
From: "Munson, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 3:03 PM
Subject: RE: CF, Ajax and shared hosting.
>> Is one of the CF/Ajax solutions better/easier to use in a
>> shared hosting environment
> Is one of the CF/Ajax solutions better/easier to use in a
> shared hosting environment with limited access to CF
> Administrator functionality?
The short answer, no. The long answer is that AjaxCFC is more portable,
and thus easier to code if you are working with a shared server
(assuming you
From what I've read, you shouldn't have to set anything in the CF Admin
for any of the Ajax libraries (Dojo, Prototype, Rico, et al) out there
since you include them in your templates.
I believe the same goes for AjaxCFC so you should be fine.
Rey...
Ian Skinner wrote:
> Is one of the CF/Ajax
Is one of the CF/Ajax solutions better/easier to use in a shared hosting
environment with limited access to CF Administrator functionality?
I'm looking into the possibility of building some Ajax functionality into one
of my sites. But it is hosted on a shared server so I will not have complete
19 matches
Mail list logo
