ECTED]
Sent: 08 September 2006 16:00
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF5 to CFMX (Was: Hosting companies)
Doug Brown wrote:
> Ok, looks like a couple of good ones. I have always used CF5 and I
> guess I am just an old goat that does not want to change. What issues
> has people had running the
>Ok, looks like a couple of good ones. I have always used CF5 and I guess I
>am just an old goat that does not want to change. What issues has people had
>running there CF5 apps on CFMX machines? It does not look like very many
>hosting companies out there are still using version 5
We're in the mi
.
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Root" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: CF5 to CFMX (Was: Hosting companies)
> Doug Brown wrote:
> > Ok, looks like a couple of good ones. I have always used CF5 an
Doug Brown wrote:
> Ok, looks like a couple of good ones. I have always used CF5 and I guess I
> am just an old goat that does not want to change. What issues has people had
> running there CF5 apps on CFMX machines? It does not look like very many
> hosting companies out there are still using vers
17 AM
Please respond to cf-talk
To: CF-Talk
cc: (bcc: Scott A. Stewart/REAC/HHQ/HUD)
Subject: CF5 to CFMX (Was: Hosting companies)
Ok, looks like a couple of good ones. I have always used CF5 and I guess I
am just an old goat that does not want to chan
Ok, looks like a couple of good ones. I have always used CF5 and I guess I
am just an old goat that does not want to change. What issues has people had
running there CF5 apps on CFMX machines? It does not look like very many
hosting companies out there are still using version 5
- Original Me
6 matches
Mail list logo
