RE: CFML vs. CFX

actually I just tried the REReplace(#form.summary#,"<[^>]*>", "", "All") but it is getting tripped up by the "<[^>]*" -Original Message- From: Brian P. Doyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 10:57 AM To:

RE: CFML vs. CFX

I'm using CF_TAGSTRIPPER it'll strip all html tags except for the ones that I specify. I'm looking for one that would be faster -Original Message- From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 10:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: R

RE: CFML vs. CFX

where can I get a tag like that? -Original Message- From: Bryan Batchelder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 10:23 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: CFML vs. CFX This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this forma

RE: CFML vs. CFX

ROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CFML vs. CFX I just installed a custom tag to strip html out of my search results. The problem is that it slows things down horribly. (I had to put it in the cfoutput of the query so that it stripped every record). I'm

Re: CFML vs. CFX

sage - From: Brian P. Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 3:10 PM Subject: CFML vs. CFX > I just installed a custom tag to strip html out of my search results. The > problem is that it slows things down horribly. (I had to put it in the

CFML vs. CFX

I just installed a custom tag to strip html out of my search results. The problem is that it slows things down horribly. (I had to put it in the cfoutput of the query so that it stripped every record). I'm curious if a CFX tag would work faster. If anyone has any light to shed on this it would