RE: CFPROCPARAM behavior change with MX+Oracle?

2002-07-26 Thread James Ang
James Ang Senior Programmer MedSeek, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Adam Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 10:23 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFPROCPARAM behavior change with MX+Oracle? Yeah, lots change with Oracle between 5 an

Re: CFPROCPARAM behavior change with MX+Oracle?

2002-07-25 Thread Adam Churvis
- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 11:24 AM Subject: CFPROCPARAM behavior change with MX+Oracle? > Hey all, > > I'm wondering if anybody else has noticed that CFStoredProc and > CFProcParam behavior has cha

Re: CFPROCPARAM behavior change with MX+Oracle?

2002-07-25 Thread freddy
Whenever I have used ORACLE stored procs (and we use ORACLE and SPs eclusively here) with CF version 4, 4.5.1, 5 I have had to specify the params in order or I recieved the "wrong number of calls or types" error. As far as I know this has always been the situation but I could always be

RE: CFPROCPARAM behavior change with MX+Oracle?

2002-07-25 Thread Andy Ewings
02 16:24 To: CF-Talk Subject: CFPROCPARAM behavior change with MX+Oracle? Hey all, I'm wondering if anybody else has noticed that CFStoredProc and CFProcParam behavior has changed (with Oracle) from Pre-MX to MX with respect to 'Named Notation' no longer working for Oracle in MX? O

CFPROCPARAM behavior change with MX+Oracle?

2002-07-25 Thread smith
Hey all, I'm wondering if anybody else has noticed that CFStoredProc and CFProcParam behavior has changed (with Oracle) from Pre-MX to MX with respect to 'Named Notation' no longer working for Oracle in MX? Or was everybody just smart and have their CFProcParams in the right order before? In Pr