On Wednesday, August 14, 2002, at 06:51 , Will Ryan wrote:
> Well I don't want to name the vendor, they have a good product, it works
> and is being used. I'm just concerned that using CGI rather then CF or
> even
> ASP for that matter is a step in the wrong direction. I'm even more
> concern
-
From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CGI & Sun Vs. CF & NT HELP
A well designed CGI is better than a poorly designed CF app.
You can do a google search for CGI inefficiencies. I would suggest you
scrap the Sun box
le vs. a modern database. I just need to
> explain to management the pros/cons of CGI Vs CF.
>
> Thanks!
> Will
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:45 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CGI & Sun
tabase. I just need to
explain to management the pros/cons of CGI Vs CF.
Thanks!
Will
-Original Message-
From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:45 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CGI & Sun Vs. CF & NT HELP
We don't know what this new app is
We don't know what this new app is. How about a link so we can evaluate it
ourselves. You have only given your biased view of this new app and no
details whatsoever. Anyone responding to your post is uninformed.
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Will Ryan wrote:
> Here's the skinny
>
> I'm being told that m
Here's the skinny
I'm being told that my company wants to replace our current CF system with a
"off the shelf" system. The off the shelf system meets our needs but it
written in CGI & runs on a Sun box. (Our current system blows, but we're
rebuilding it internally) The new system works with an
6 matches
Mail list logo
