> You might be advised, given how badly it sounds the
> application is written, to change the client store setting
> in the administrator, so that all applications, whether
> they have a cfapplication tag or not, actually use a
> datasource rather than the registry.
One thing worth mentioning
Karl,
>
> 1) Is my conclusion true, did CF 4.0 default to the Registry (or the
> default setup in the CF Administrator for client variable storage) if the
> database specified in the CFAPPLICATION tag for client variable storage
did
> not contain CDATA and CGLOBAL tables?
>
I can't say for certain
> 1) Is my conclusion true, did CF 4.0 default to the Registry
> (or the default setup in the CF Administrator for client
> variable storage) if the database specified in the CFAPPLICATION
> tag for client variable storage did not contain CDATA and
> CGLOBAL tables?
I have no idea, since I've
Storage in CF 5.0 versus 4.0
I have some questions relating to how client variable storage was handled
in CF 4.0 compared to how it is handled today in CF 5.0. Some background
information may help these questions make sense by putting them in context:
Background info
===
I am upgrading
Grrr... flipping mail servers... grumble groan...
sorry in advance for the resend.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Moretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: Client Variable Storag
I have some questions relating to how client variable storage was handled
in CF 4.0 compared to how it is handled today in CF 5.0. Some background
information may help these questions make sense by putting them in context:
Background info
===
I am upgrading a web site (not of my de
6 matches
Mail list logo
