Don't know if this will help but:
A recent issue of E-Week (Oct. 30 2000 Vol. 17 #44) did a comparison of 4
programming languages for the purpose of creating dynamic sites.
They tested .cfm, .asp, .jsp and .php applications on similar systems.
The jist of the articles is as follows:
Speed:
CF
Jay Jennings wrote:
>
> > However, I've found ASP to be a cleaner language. It's based on
> > VB so it's
>
> Actually, ASP isn't a language, it's a (something else). So you don't
> necessarily want to compare CF with ASP, but CF with either VBScript or
> JavaScript (the Big Two ASP languages)
Best one yet!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 1:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Cold Fusion vs. PHP or ASP]
Well all i know is 1 year ago i was a balding overweight developer but
aftyer 1 year of coldfusion now have
Well all i know is 1 year ago i was a balding overweight developer but aftyer 1 year
of coldfusion now have a full head of hair and i look like a long distance runner
MikeC
#code.monkey#
Change is the only constant
Download NeoPlanet at http://www.neoplanet.com
> However, I've found ASP to be a cleaner language. It's based on
> VB so it's
Actually, ASP isn't a language, it's a (something else). So you don't
necessarily want to compare CF with ASP, but CF with either VBScript or
JavaScript (the Big Two ASP languages).
My current project is ASP -- but u
Here's a link comparing all the big scripting languages:
http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/99/46/index1a.html?tw=programming
--
Michael She
I m a g i n e C o m m u n i c a t i o n s
Company E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ UIN: #243466
Personal Homepage: http:
ColdFusion is definately easier to program than with ASP. With ASP you'll
have to know some details about microsoft ADO to connect to
Databases. With CF, many of the intricate details are hidden.
However, I've found ASP to be a cleaner language. It's based on VB so it's
eaiser to read than
True, and you can read all that others have said about it by searching
through the archives.
> This topic has been run through the mud. If you want to go a certain
route:
> first make a conclusion , run tests to support that conclusion , show test
> results to your manager.
>
> ColdFusion costs
This topic has been run through the mud. If you want to go a certain route:
first make a conclusion , run tests to support that conclusion , show test
results to your manager.
ColdFusion costs money.
ASP only runs on MS.
PHP is free (managers are usually afraid to go that way [cya]).
As far as
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 7:38 AM
> Hi, does anyone have any definitive feedback on how Cold Fusion, PHP & ASP
> rate against each other in terms of speed, scalability, robustness.
>
> I believe in terms of ease of development Cold Fu
Hi, does anyone have any definitive feedback on how Cold Fusion, PHP & ASP
rate against each other in terms of speed, scalability, robustness.
I believe in terms of ease of development Cold Fusion is hands down the
winner, but how about on those other fronts over the long run?
Also, which works
11 matches
Mail list logo
