On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
> That looks like it's fun to maintain. Fortunately, there aren't ever
> any new mobile devices.
With any luck its not so bad. That code is the CF version supplied by
http://detectmobilebrowsers.com.. Last updated Feb 28 according to the
site.
quot;
ability with no hover or at least create the need for two clicks, one to see
the preview and another to see the content, if we have to rely only on
clicking/touching.
-Original Message-
From: .jonah [mailto:jonah@creori.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 12:17 AM
To: cf-talk
Subje
) that web designers/developers
had to wrestle with mostly, now it seems that the hardware has
become as much, if not more of a challenge.
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 12:13 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: detecting mob
gt; -Original Message-
> From: .jonah [mailto:jonah@creori.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 8:25 PM
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: Re: detecting mobile devices
>
>
> All the projects I'm working on now are "responsive" e.g. using flexible
> layouts and media que
I'm not yet. (Don't have any target hardware.) :(
I would hope that the same touch events are fired in the desktop
versions of the browsers. Otherwise it'd be just mean making sure your
app uses click but not hover events.
On 6/10/12 9:12 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> Out of curiosity, how are yo
Out of curiosity, how are you accounting for desktops with touch interfaces?
cheers,
Judah
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 5:25 PM, .jonah wrote:
>
> All the projects I'm working on now are "responsive" e.g. using flexible
> layouts and media queries.
>
> However, there are always going to be certain e
on to this problem other than to us JS to
set the css to "display:none" while the overlay is in place.
Is there a simpler way?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: .jonah [mailto:jonah@creori.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 8:25 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: detecting mobile devices
etecting specific mobile
> devices to be preferable to "Responsive Web Design"?
>
> Interested to know you thoughts and experience.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rick
>
> -Original Message-
> From: .jonah [mailto:jonah@creori.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012
nt: Sunday, June 10, 2012 7:52 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: detecting mobile devices
This JavaScript value extractor would be pretty easy to translate to CF too:
http://www.quirksmode.org/js/detect.html
On 6/10/12 10:39 AM, RICHARD SIMPSON II wrote:
> HTTP_USER_AGENT : String ReReplac
This JavaScript value extractor would be pretty easy to translate to CF too:
http://www.quirksmode.org/js/detect.html
On 6/10/12 10:39 AM, RICHARD SIMPSON II wrote:
> HTTP_USER_AGENT : String ReReplace (UNFINISHED)
>
> <>
> My idea is to extract each instance
HTTP_USER_AGENT : String ReReplace (UNFINISHED)
<>
My idea is to extract each instance before ";" so we can auto detect operating
systems, browser versions, and future devices. This data can be placed in a
table, xml file, etc. Thus, it can be logged, massage
True true.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:01 PM, John M Bliss wrote:
>
> In our defense, that limitation was not actually in OP. And he *was*
> posting
> to CFTalk after all... :-)
> On Oct 4, 2011 5:59 PM, "Michael Grant" wrote:
> >
> > I know I've already been beaten down for not properly readin
In our defense, that limitation was not actually in OP. And he *was* posting
to CFTalk after all... :-)
On Oct 4, 2011 5:59 PM, "Michael Grant" wrote:
>
> I know I've already been beaten down for not properly reading the OP's
post,
> so it's a bit of the pot calling the kettle black... but he d
I know I've already been beaten down for not properly reading the OP's post,
so it's a bit of the pot calling the kettle black... but he did mention:
*"we sort of have this limitation using html/js only. No coldfusion
unfortunately."*
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Robert Harrison
wrote:
>
>
> I do know whether to be scared or impressed that you managed to notice that..
Ack. Meant to type: I do *not* know whether to be scared or impressed ...
-Leigh
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.c
> What are you talking about Dave? It's neatly split into two clauses, and
> the 4-letter ones are alphabetized. Ha ha.
I do know whether to be scared or impressed that you managed to notice that..
-Le
~|
Order the Adobe Co
What are you talking about Dave? It's neatly split into two clauses, and
the 4-letter ones are alphabetized. Ha ha.
-- Josh
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
>
> > This works.
> >
> > reFindNoCase("android.+mobile|avantgo|bada\/|blackberry|blazer|compal|elaine|fennec|
> This works.
>
> reFindNoCase("android.+mobile|avantgo|bada\/|blackberry|blazer|compal|elaine|fennec|hiptop|iemobile|ip(hone|od)|iris|kindle|lge
> |maemo|midp|mmp|opera m(ob|in)i|palm(
> os)?|phone|p(ixi|re)\/|plucker|pocket|psp|symbian|treo|up\.(browser|link)|vodafone|wap|windows
> (ce|
This works.
Yes, I am a mobile device.
No, I'm not a mobile device
Robert B. Harrison
Director of Interactive Services
Austin & Williams
125 Kennedy Drive, Suite 100
Hauppauge NY 11788
P : 631.231.6600 Ext. 119
F : 631.434.7022
http://www.austin-williams.com
Great ad
check this out... a wurfl web service
http://www.wurflws.com/index.jsp
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoff
the best and cheapest mobile and tablet detection is
http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/
itself.
--
Regards,
Andrew Scott
WebSite: http://www.andyscott.id.au/
Google+: http://plus.google.com/108193156965451149543
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Don wrote:
>
> Anyone using : MobileRedirect?
>
>
Anyone using : MobileRedirect?
http://mobilewebdeveloper.com/index.cfm/page/purchase/item/MobileRedirect
It SEEMS pretty good. They say...
"identifies more than 96% of all mobile devices (test was conducted with the
most recent copy of WURFL"
~
You're right. I didn't read your reply close enough.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Don wrote:
>
> > >Honestly, that seems silly to me. If you have to use js then why
> > obfuscate
> > >it by adapting cf to js? Why not just approach it with js natively?
> > >
> > >http://www.hand-interacti
> >Honestly, that seems silly to me. If you have to use js then why
> obfuscate
> >it by adapting cf to js? Why not just approach it with js natively?
> >
> >http://www.hand-interactive.com/resources/detect-mobile-javascript.
> htm
>
>
> Given your description, I'm not sure you have understood
>Honestly, that seems silly to me. If you have to use js then why obfuscate
>it by adapting cf to js? Why not just approach it with js natively?
>
>http://www.hand-interactive.com/resources/detect-mobile-javascript.htm
Given your description, I'm not sure you have understood the requirement.
G
Honestly, that seems silly to me. If you have to use js then why obfuscate
it by adapting cf to js? Why not just approach it with js natively?
http://www.hand-interactive.com/resources/detect-mobile-javascript.htm
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Don wrote:
>
> >Yes: use WURFL.
>
> Does this
>Yes: use WURFL.
Does this sound like a resonable solution
download WURFL file, pick out the specific few things we are looking for and
insert that into our database. Then when we get a user-agent that is mobile we
could detect that with a query to our db.
~~
we sort of have this limitation using html/js only. No coldfusion
unfortunately.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://ww
Yes: use WURFL.
This might be useful: http://cfwurfl.riaforge.org/
--
Shu Ha Ri: Agile and .NET blog
http://www.bifrost.com.au/
On 4 October 2011 22:20, Don wrote:
>
> We have a requirement to 'detect mobile devices'.
>
> ... are there any recommendations.
>
>
~
You should be able to compare cgi.HTTP_USER_AGENT to:
http://www.zytrax.com/tech/web/mobile_ids.html
http://whatsmyuseragent.com/CommonUserAgents.asp
etc
...and render accordingly.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Don wrote:
>
> We have a requirement to 'detect mobile devices'.
>
> I've done
We have a requirement to 'detect mobile devices'.
I've done some priliminary research and see some are using WURFL file.
Is there anyone here using this?
Also was wondering what others have been using for this? and are there any
recommendations.
Thanks
~~~
That regex gave me a headache...wow! hehehehe
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 9:54 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Detecting Mobile Devices
> I have just finished the development of a mobile site for our
> univ
, 2010 9:57 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Detecting Mobile Devices
Try WURFL:
http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/
--
WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/
On 13 October 2010 21:16, Steve LaBadie wrote:
>
> I have just finished the development of a mobile site f
Try WURFL:
http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/
--
WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/
On 13 October 2010 21:16, Steve LaBadie wrote:
>
> I have just finished the development of a mobile site for our
> university. I have placed a redirect script on the home page and
>
> I have just finished the development of a mobile site for our
> university. I have placed a redirect script on the home page and
> everything seems to be working. I was wondering if there is a more
> streamlined approach to detecting the different devices. Right now I am
> checking for specific
From: Steve LaBadie [mailto:slaba...@po-box.esu.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 8:16 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Detecting Mobile Devices
I have just finished the development of a mobile site for our university. I
have placed a redirect script on the home page and everything seems to be
w
I have just finished the development of a mobile site for our
university. I have placed a redirect script on the home page and
everything seems to be working. I was wondering if there is a more
streamlined approach to detecting the different devices. Right now I am
checking for specific brands. I
37 matches
Mail list logo
