> -Original Message-
> From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The hd is an obvious bottleneck.
If you really want to boost I/O, look into some of the good Opteron
systems that use the nForce Professional chipsets, they have much better
I/O than the comparable Intel x86 systems. Couple
The point is with a web system, over 90% of the calls would be reads.
Russ
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 12:39 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Dual Xeon 3.06 GHz - 120 GB IDE HD - 2 GB RAM
>
&g
AIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 January 2006 16:21
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Dual Xeon 3.06 GHz - 120 GB IDE HD - 2 GB RAM
I'm not so sure about that. Check wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redundant_array_of_independent_disks#RAID_1
It states that with Raid 1 (mirror) the write speed is th
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:55 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Dual Xeon 3.06 GHz - 120 GB IDE HD - 2 GB RAM
>
> >It states that with Raid 1 (mirror) the write speed is the same
>
> I cant see where it says that?
> Maybe a case of temporary blin
rate, and half the seek time.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kerry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:55 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Dual Xeon 3.06 GHz - 120 GB IDE HD - 2 GB RAM
>
> >It states that with Raid 1 (mirror) the write speed
1
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Dual Xeon 3.06 GHz - 120 GB IDE HD - 2 GB RAM
I'm not so sure about that. Check wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redundant_array_of_independent_disks#RAID_1
It states that with Raid 1 (mirror) the write speed is the same as a single
disk, and the rea
ually). Seek time is also halved.
Russ
> -Original Message-
> From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 6:23 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Dual Xeon 3.06 GHz - 120 GB IDE HD - 2 GB RAM
>
> On 1/18/06, Baz <[EMAI
/o even thinking twice -- more
flexibility for either redundancy (RAID 1, 5, 10) or speed (RAID 0)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:06 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Dual Xeon 3.06 GHz - 120 GB IDE HD - 2 GB
Good call.
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Dual Xeon 3.06 GHz - 120 GB IDE HD - 2 GB RAM
The hd is an obvious bottleneck. That's usually the slowest point in your
system. I would use a SC
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 2:49 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Dual Xeon 3.06 GHz - 120 GB IDE HD - 2 GB RAM
>
> If I installed:
>- CFMX7 Enterprise
>- MySQL 5.0
>
> On the following machine:
> - Dual Xeon 3.06 GHz - 120 GB IDE H
If I installed:
- CFMX7 Enterprise
- MySQL 5.0
On the following machine:
- Dual Xeon 3.06 GHz - 120 GB IDE HD - 2 GB RAM
Am I making good use of the hardware? Can both technologies fully utilize
the CPU and RAM? Any obvious bottlenecks, perhaps add another GB of ram?
Cheers,
Baz
11 matches
Mail list logo
