Re: Error found by CF45 but Not CFMX7?

2005-11-14 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
Basically, what you are doing inside the loop is unnecessary, you already have a cfoutput on the page. Correction, the original author of the tag did that, not me. I have it on my agenda to clean all those out, I was more making reference to the fact that the bug didn't get caught in CFMX 7

Error found by CF45 but Not CFMX7?

2005-11-13 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
Had an interesting issue come up on Friday - I had sent some code to a client for a small job I was working on and got a message back that there was a syntax error. I replied that it had not happened on my setup and showed them via a series of screen shots; they replied with a screen shot of the

RE: Error found by CF45 but Not CFMX7?

2005-11-13 Thread Adrian Lynch
Yup, it was something that cropped up back when CF6 came out. Putting code from 6 to 5 highlighted this. Ade -Original Message- From: C. Hatton Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 November 2005 19:12 To: CF-Talk Subject: Error found by CF45 but Not CFMX7? Had an interesting

Re: Error found by CF45 but Not CFMX7?

2005-11-13 Thread Matt Robertson
You could say its no longer an error. I ran into this back when MX came out. I was developing on a 6.0 dev box and porting live to a 4.5.1 box. Not something you want to build into your code from scratch, but in a pinch this loosening of the reins can be very handy. I am now porting a CF5 app

Re: Error found by CF45 but Not CFMX7?

2005-11-13 Thread Alan Rother
Hatton, Basically, what you are doing inside the loop is unnecessary, you already have a cfoutput on the page. In previous version of CF the only time you were allowed to nest cfoutputs was inside a grouped query output. Now they've basically removed the check from CFMX and beyond so that it is