I probably should have qualified that a little more. If I develop a
"thing" from scratch, and just dive right into coding, it might take
two weeks. If I spend time to gather requirements, spec it out, do a
good design, and then implement it, it might take 2.5 weeks, and the
coding will start afte
Thanx Barney once more again for your patience in answer questions like that.
MD
2005/8/11, Michel Deloux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks Barney. "Percieved development speed is governed by the
> methodology, not a framework.". Really great!
>
> MD.
>
> 2005/8/11, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Thanks Barney. "Percieved development speed is governed by the
methodology, not a framework.". Really great!
MD.
2005/8/11, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I didn't quite understand your question, but I'll try and answer anyway. ;)
>
> Frameworks are just pieces of code to help you do "
I didn't quite understand your question, but I'll try and answer anyway. ;)
Frameworks are just pieces of code to help you do "something" in your
code. Fusebox, Mach-II, and Model-Glue are all structure frameworks;
they provide a skeleton from which to hang you application code, and
take care o
Ok, ok. It depends. Other question: framework and speed dev are the
same thing? Or not? I believe(my point of view) that using frameworks
make development harder to code. I'm right? It's possible to separate
100% between M V C?
Thanx
MD
2005/8/11, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Same answ
Same answer: "it depends". In this case it depends on the dev team
and their experience, whether you need a 100% separate between UI and
application (for multiple UIs) or if a little (or a lot) fudging is
ok, etc. There is rarely a simple answer.
If you pick one framework and always use it, you'
> I just think it's great that we have such a choice with
> CF. We argue (converse) about which one is BEST! That's
> what makes it so powerful. You can be an amateur like me
> and code the basics, orrr you can code like lots of
> you guys do.
> BTW, I don't use any of them. My apps are usuall
Which method do you recommend for developing a large-scale website/portal?
MG
>Shrug...I don't think there is one. It depends on what you need. I
>wrote Model-Glue, but I'm sitting here using Fusebox because it makes
>the most sense for the project I'm working on.
>
>-Joe
>
>On 8/10/05, Miche
I just think it's great that we have such a choice with CF. We argue (converse)
about which one is BEST! That's what makes it so powerful. You can be an
amateur like me and code the basics, orrr you can code like lots of you
guys do.
BTW, I don't use any of them. My apps are usually too b
I'll ditto the "It Depends" comment, and also ditto the Model-Glue
recommendation. I'm really digging MG so far.
On 8/10/05, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Model-glue = more gooder.
>
> Though, I agree with Barney and Joe, the answer really is, 'It depends'.
>
> On what? Well, the type
Model-glue = more gooder.
Though, I agree with Barney and Joe, the answer really is, 'It depends'.
On what? Well, the type of application, what level of OO experience you
have, stuff like that.
On 8/10/05, Joe Rinehart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Shrug...I don't think there is one. It depe
Shrug...I don't think there is one. It depends on what you need. I
wrote Model-Glue, but I'm sitting here using Fusebox because it makes
the most sense for the project I'm working on.
-Joe
On 8/10/05, Michel Deloux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personal point of view: choose the best Framework f
Presumably you were soliciting opinions?
For full-app development, ModelGlue would be my choice, I'd say. For
UI's, Fusebox 3, hands down.
cheers,
barneyb
On 8/10/05, Michel Deloux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personal point of view: choose the best Framework for CF.
>
> Thanks
>
> MD
>
--
Personal point of view: choose the best Framework for CF.
Thanks
MD
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a
clien
14 matches
Mail list logo
