RE: Help with CFC and recursion?

2003-05-27 Thread Shawn Grover
CF-Talk Subject: Re: Help with CFC and recursion? On Monday, May 26, 2003, at 17:41 US/Pacific, Shawn Grover wrote: > I've tried a number of combinations for the code, and always seem to > get a > similar result. You need to use 'var' to declare your variables local -

Re: Help with CFC and recursion?

2003-05-27 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 13:14 US/Pacific, Shawn Grover wrote: > As for my use of the CFPROPERTY tags, I know they are kinda useless in > the > manner I'm using them, EXCEPT for documentation. And of course it all depends on whether you want to use public data members - "this" scope - which

RE: Help with CFC and recursion?

2003-05-27 Thread Shawn Grover
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 4:10 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Help with CFC and recursion? Are other folks relying on cfproperty for auto-documenting public data members? How do you deal with keeping the cfproperty tags in sync with what you actually do with "t

Re: Help with CFC and recursion?

2003-05-27 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 16:20 US/Pacific, Shawn Grover wrote: > We're declaring a Clear function which initializes the THIS properties > to a > valid, known state. Our procedure is to ensure the clear function > matches > the CFPROPERTY declarations, and we call the Clear function when the

RE: Help with CFC and recursion?

2003-05-27 Thread Shawn Grover
to simply validate the properties before saves, and allow the calling code to call the isValid method as well. k, I've rambled on long enough... hope this helps someone out there. Shawn -Original Message- From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5

Re: Help with CFC and recursion?

2003-05-27 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 17:30 US/Pacific, Shawn Grover wrote: > We were initially going to create get and set methods for member > variables (not in the THIS scope), but quickly realized this was > meaningless, because I was free to set variables on the object > willy-nilly. But the variable