On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Dominic Watson wrote:
> Sounds awesome ;)
It is pretty cool, and the annotation approach is very tempting.
There are so many ways to do it tho... and I'm seriously thinking a
modeling language is where it's really at, but, this is still way fun.
=]
> So in theor
04 998 273
-Original Message-
From: Dominic Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 17 August 2008 12:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Hibernate (was: annotations?)
Sounds awesome ;)
So in theory, CF could use Hibernate (when it releases that stuff in
9) to automatically parametise a quer
Mobile: 0404 998 273
-Original Message-
From: denstar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 17 August 2008 9:44 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Hibernate (was: annotations?)
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Dominic Watson wrote:
[...]
> A question for anyone who knows hibernate then; does it requ
Sounds awesome ;)
So in theory, CF could use Hibernate (when it releases that stuff in
9) to automatically parametise a query, with no extra work from the
developer, ie. the developer just writes:
SELECT foo FROM bar WHERE foobar = 4570
and cf then parses the query to see what are para
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Dominic Watson wrote:
[...]
> A question for anyone who knows hibernate then; does it require
> configuration per database, rely on convention or does it query the
> schema to generate its mappings automatically?
You can do it however you want it, man!
It'll reve
5 matches
Mail list logo
