On Tuesday 05 December 2006 15:33, Greg Luce wrote:
> image on each request. Just when a user uploads an image, store the
> original, create a thumbnail, and create a resized version for use on the
> site and apply a watermark to it. ImageMagic works wonderfully for that.
For instance, aye.
--
T
>>I am curious as how you can add a watermark to an image without having to
create a new image.
See CFX_StampImage here :
http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/stampImage/testStamp.cfm
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/cl
Oh I see what you're saying. I've never run into a reason to watermark an
image on each request. Just when a user uploads an image, store the
original, create a thumbnail, and create a resized version for use on the
site and apply a watermark to it. ImageMagic works wonderfully for that.
Greg
On
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 14:36, Andy Matthews wrote:
> But then they're no longer "new" for each request. You can't have it both
> ways.
You'd only want them 'new' if you wanted the current time stamped on them, and
I can't see a use case for that right now.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to heter
But then they're no longer "new" for each request. You can't have it both
ways.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 8:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Images and Watermarks?
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 13
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 13:53, Rick Root wrote:
> so if you were on a busy web site, watermarking the images on the fly
> *ALL* the time... you'd be doing a lot of completely unnecessary work.
Well, yes, you'd cache them somewhere :-)
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to appropriately maximize turn-k
Greg Luce wrote:
> ImageMagic does this just brilliantly. I've done it on a fairly large scale.
> I'm curious Rick, why would it not "scale" well?
Watermarking an image is a lot more CPU intensive than just pullling an
existing image off the file system.
so if you were on a busy web site, waterm
ImageMagic does this just brilliantly. I've done it on a fairly large scale.
I'm curious Rick, why would it not "scale" well?
Greg
On 12/5/06, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 05 December 2006 10:42, Coldfusion wrote:
> > I am curious as how you can add a watermark to an image
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 10:42, Coldfusion wrote:
> I am curious as how you can add a watermark to an image without
> having to create a new image.
I'm sure you could, but why would you want to? Watermarking an image
with every request would not scale very well.
You could "cache" watermark
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 12:26, Katz, Dov B (IT) wrote:
> The only company I've seen which can do this is
> http://www.photags.com/activewatermarks.htm
Way to not be cross platform.
I guess they're making use of the fact JPEG can contain meta data regions.
The system is still weak because I can
The only company I've seen which can do this is
http://www.photags.com/activewatermarks.htm
-Original Message-
From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 7:20 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Images and Watermarks?
On Tuesday 05 December 2006
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 10:42, Coldfusion wrote:
> I am curious as how you can add a watermark to an image without having to
> create a new image.
Can't be done reliably- you have to create a watermarked version and keep the
original.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to assertively brand second-gen
!
-Original Message-
From: Coldfusion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 5:35 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Images and Watermarks?
I am curious as how you can add a watermark to an image without having to
create a new image.
Like some of the photo sites have images and when they
I am curious as how you can add a watermark to an image without having to
create a new image.
Like some of the photo sites have images and when they are enlarged, you see
the watermark
but if you purchase it is gone.
Any pointers?
~~~
14 matches
Mail list logo
