RE: Invoking component

2007-10-11 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
Sent: 10 October 2007 22:26 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Invoking component >>Damn, I replied to the wrong thread . . and you've got a severe hiccup? -- ___ REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm (Pl

Re: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread henry ho
Use CFINVOKE to invoke static UDF in a CFC, without CreateObject? Henry >> Using the CFINVOKE tag, CFSET and wrapped in CFSCRIPT. So >> what is the best method? > >They are all equally good. > >> Or are there different situations where you would use one or >> the other? > >Yes, although you co

Re: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Bryan Stevenson
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and permanently destroy all copies of this message and attachments. - Original Message - From: "Robert Rawlins - Think Blue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:30 AM Subject: RE: Inv

Re: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Claude Schneegans
>>Damn, I replied to the wrong thread . and you've got a severe hiccup? -- ___ REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Thanks. ~

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Loathe
How bout that? -Original Message- From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 1:23 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Invoking component Damn, I replied to the wrong thread ... doh! Apologies for the hijacking! Rob -Original Message

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Andy Matthews
And apparently replied many times as well. :) -Original Message- From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 12:43 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Invoking component Damn, I replied to the wrong thread ... doh! Apologies for the hijacking

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
Damn, I replied to the wrong thread ... doh! Apologies for the hijacking! Rob -Original Message- From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 17:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Invoking component Thanks guys for your thoughts on this, you'r

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
Damn, I replied to the wrong thread ... doh! Apologies for the hijacking! Rob -Original Message- From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 17:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Invoking component Thanks guys for your thoughts on this, you'r

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
Damn, I replied to the wrong thread ... doh! Apologies for the hijacking! Rob -Original Message- From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 17:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Invoking component Thanks guys for your thoughts on this, you'r

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
Damn, I replied to the wrong thread ... doh! Apologies for the hijacking! Rob -Original Message- From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 17:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Invoking component Thanks guys for your thoughts on this, you'r

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
Damn, I replied to the wrong thread ... doh! Apologies for the hijacking! Rob -Original Message- From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 17:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Invoking component Thanks guys for your thoughts on this, you'r

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
Damn, I replied to the wrong thread ... doh! Apologies for the hijacking! Rob -Original Message- From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 17:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Invoking component Thanks guys for your thoughts on this, you'r

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
Damn, I replied to the wrong thread ... doh! Apologies for the hijacking! Rob -Original Message- From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 17:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Invoking component Thanks guys for your thoughts on this, you'r

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
Damn, I replied to the wrong thread ... doh! Apologies for the hijacking! Rob -Original Message- From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 17:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Invoking component Thanks guys for your thoughts on this, you'r

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
Damn, I replied to the wrong thread ... doh! Apologies for the hijacking! Rob -Original Message- From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 17:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Invoking component Thanks guys for your thoughts on this, you'r

Re: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Brian Kotek
b > > -Original Message- > From: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 October 2007 16:54 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Invoking component > > The only real advantage that I'm aware of is that CFINVOKE allows you to > dynamically specify the targe

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
Damn, I replied to the wrong thread ... doh! Apologies for the hijacking! Rob -Original Message- From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 17:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Invoking component Thanks guys for your thoughts on this, you'r

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
Damn, I replied to the wrong thread ... doh! Apologies for the hijacking! Rob -Original Message- From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 17:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Invoking component Thanks guys for your thoughts on this, you'r

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
Damn, I replied to the wrong thread ... doh! Apologies for the hijacking! Rob -Original Message- From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 17:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Invoking component Thanks guys for your thoughts on this, you'r

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
Damn, I replied to the wrong thread ... doh! Apologies for the hijacking! Rob -Original Message- From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 17:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Invoking component Thanks guys for your thoughts on this, you'r

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
rom: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 16:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Invoking component The only real advantage that I'm aware of is that CFINVOKE allows you to dynamically specify the target component and method. I use it when I need that capability, but otherwis

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
rom: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 16:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Invoking component The only real advantage that I'm aware of is that CFINVOKE allows you to dynamically specify the target component and method. I use it when I need that capability, but otherwis

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
rom: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 16:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Invoking component The only real advantage that I'm aware of is that CFINVOKE allows you to dynamically specify the target component and method. I use it when I need that capability, but otherwis

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
rom: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 16:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Invoking component The only real advantage that I'm aware of is that CFINVOKE allows you to dynamically specify the target component and method. I use it when I need that capability, but otherwis

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
rom: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2007 16:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Invoking component The only real advantage that I'm aware of is that CFINVOKE allows you to dynamically specify the target component and method. I use it when I need that capability, but otherwis

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Dave Watts
> Using the CFINVOKE tag, CFSET and wrapped in CFSCRIPT. So > what is the best method? They are all equally good. > Or are there different situations where you would use one or > the other? Yes, although you could simply use one in all cases if you really wanted to. If you're creating objects,

RE: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Andy Matthews
EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:49 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Invoking component OK, so I see that there are at least three ways to invoke a component. Using the CFINVOKE tag, CFSET and wrapped in CFSCRIPT. So what is the best method? Or are there different situations where you

Re: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Matt Williams
On 10/10/07, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, so I see that there are at least three ways to invoke a component. > Using the CFINVOKE tag, CFSET and wrapped in CFSCRIPT. So what is the > best method? Or are there different situations where you would use one > or the other? I would think

Re: Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Brian Kotek
The only real advantage that I'm aware of is that CFINVOKE allows you to dynamically specify the target component and method. I use it when I need that capability, but otherwise I find it too verbose. On 10/10/07, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, so I see that there are at least thre

Invoking component

2007-10-10 Thread Bruce Sorge
OK, so I see that there are at least three ways to invoke a component. Using the CFINVOKE tag, CFSET and wrapped in CFSCRIPT. So what is the best method? Or are there different situations where you would use one or the other? I would think that each has an advantage and disadvantage. I typicall