Re: Locking again (sorry)

On 12/12/01, Tage Widsell penned: >I know that I must lock every read from a shared scope variable, but what >about checking for it's existence? Is that ok without locking? For example: > > > ...do this and that... > isDefined is a Read. You'll only be able to leave it unlocked if Automatic

Re: Locking again (sorry)

Tage Widsell wrote: > Just a little detail: > > I know that I must lock every read from a shared scope variable, but what > about checking for it's existence? Is that ok without locking? For example: > > > ...do this and that... > You need to lock those too. Jochem

Locking again (sorry)

Just a little detail: I know that I must lock every read from a shared scope variable, but what about checking for it's existence? Is that ok without locking? For example: ...do this and that... Regards Tage Widsell Webmaster ~~ Get the mai