pka-Hauer - CMG, LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 3:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: MX & CHR(10)
Notepad 2 or SciTE...
Both free, both google-able... both quite nice.
Notepad2: http://www.flos-freeware.ch/np2faq.html
MOST excellent and really quite free...
Notepad 2 or SciTE...
Both free, both google-able... both quite nice.
Notepad2: http://www.flos-freeware.ch/np2faq.html
MOST excellent and really quite free... it's a hobby project for some
dude in Czechoslovakia. I emailed him a question once, and he got me
an answer in 24 hours. Not bad for a
> Based on the findings from Dave's post, I think you would be
> right. Do you know of any binary file viewing tools? I know
> Norton Utilities had one a long time ago, but not sure of
> current options. I could google it but if you have experience
> with any, let me know.
Ultraedit is very ni
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:38:59 -0500, Jerry Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like ultraedit. $40.00 (www.ultraedit.com)
I use ultraedit as well. There are some plugins for the free
programmers editor jedit (jedit.org). I haven't used it, but I hear
it's good.
~
Rookie! ;o)
Rey...
- Original Message -
From: "Dan O'Keefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: MX & CHR(10)
> Bingo Dave, that was it. On CF5 and previous version, if memory serves
> m
I like ultraedit. $40.00 (www.ultraedit.com)
Jerry Johnson
Web Developer
Dolan Media Company
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/22/05 04:39PM >>>
Chris,
Based on the findings from Dave's post, I think you would be right. Do
you know of any binary file viewing tools? I know Norton Utilities had
one a long
Chris,
Based on the findings from Dave's post, I think you would be right. Do
you know of any binary file viewing tools? I know Norton Utilities had
one a long time ago, but not sure of current options. I could google
it but if you have experience with any, let me know.
Dan
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005
Bingo Dave, that was it. On CF5 and previous version, if memory serves
me correctly, if you used both 10 & 13, it created an additional line,
and now it works properly. I think the order has to be 13 first and
then 10.
Thanks much. After upgrading a client, all of my text files that
scheduled sc
Look more closely at the output of CF 5 with a binary file viewing
tool. Check to see if for every chr(10) there's also a chr(13) before
or after the chr(10). Then do the same for the MX output. I'm guessing
CF 5 is automatically outputting a chr(13) with every chr(10) whereas
MX is not.
~
> This one is driving me nuts and I have seen the same results
> on a few different MX installations now. Anyone know the URL
> to report a bug to Macromedia I cant' believe no one else has
> run into this. It happens on a couple different scripts of
> mine, re-producible on a few different MX
This one is driving me nuts and I have seen the same results on a few
different MX installations now. Anyone know the URL to report a bug to
Macromedia I cant' believe no one else has run into this. It happens
on a couple different scripts of mine, re-producible on a few
different MX installations
a file generated by CF5 using #chr(10)# displays perfectly in notepad,
and MX does not. Guess I will try it on another MX box and see if I
can reporduce it.
Dan
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:17:44 -0600, Tony Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That could be an ASCII/BINARY problem with notepad.
>
> As
I would think not, but in my case, the difference before and after
upgrading is obvious. Going to dig a little more.
Dan
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:36:07 -0500, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Has anyone noticed a difference in the way this function works
> > in MX? I upgraded a CF 5 server
> Has anyone noticed a difference in the way this function works
> in MX? I upgraded a CF 5 server to MX and now my text files that
> I have always written out with chr(10) are not formatted
> properly and a control code is visible when viewing the file
> in notepad.
On Windows, you use two co
That could be an ASCII/BINARY problem with notepad.
As for your chr() problem itself.. have you tried changing your carriage return?
There's "#chr(13)#" or "#chr(13)##chr(10)#" or the solid "
" (entering a return yourself).
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:30:44 -0500, Dan O'Keefe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Has anyone noticed a difference in the way this function works in MX?
I upgraded a CF 5 server to MX and now my text files that I have
always written out with chr(10) are not formatted properly and a
control code is visible when viewing the file in notepad.
Dan
~~~
16 matches
Mail list logo