Is it possible to do the following:
CFTRANSACTION .
CFINVOKE component=x method=updateX .
CFINVOKE component=y method=updateY .
/CFTRANSACTION
My guess is the transaction will not be capable of rolling back.
Any insight?
Rich
Is it possible to do the following:
CFTRANSACTION .
CFINVOKE component=x method=updateX .
CFINVOKE component=y method=updateY .
/CFTRANSACTION
That is correct. Currently, you're approach will not work, as the CFCs are
not transaction-aware in this case.
Regards,
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 9:29 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Nesting CFC's in a transaction block
Is it possible to do the following:
CFTRANSACTION .
CFINVOKE component=x method=updateX .
CFINVOKE component=y method=updateY
Wow, very sweet.
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Nesting CFC's in a transaction block
Fixed in RedSky. (And yes, I know it's under NDA, but again, I was given
permission to mention certain
Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Nesting CFC's in a transaction block
Fixed in RedSky. (And yes, I know it's under NDA, but again,
I was given permission to mention certain CFC bug fixes at
the last two conferences. Thanks MACR
5 matches
Mail list logo