I think any effects of this article were proven moot yesterday; MACR
went up 22% based on their Q3 earnings.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:09:19 -, Ciliotta, Mario
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is an article I received this afternoon:
TECH BIZ from CNN/Money and Business 2.0
Wednesday,
-
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 19 januari 2005 23:40
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: News about Macrmedia and it stock...
Dreamweaver well we have Eclipse or UltraEdit, Visual Studio 2003, ..
etc..
All of those do some of the things that Dreamweaver
DWMX still remains MM's best seller out of all of their products.
Will
P.S. I'm behaving!!
~|
Logware: a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start
tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with
-
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 20 januari 2005 11:21
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: News about Macrmedia
Here's some information:
http://www.macromedia.com/macromedia/ir/macr/web_pres/earnings/q305/
-Original Message-
From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 7:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: News about Macrmedia and it stock...
I would have thought
Here is an article I received this afternoon:
TECH BIZ from CNN/Money and Business 2.0
Wednesday, January 19, 2005
***
Be the first to know when there is breaking financial news!
Sign up now to receive your BREAKING NEWS e-mail alerts.
With ever increasing demand of new features, and the enormous amount of
competiting products I can imagine the market is pretty tough for these type of
products.
I think only the Flash suite is pretty unique. Freehand, well we have
Illustrator. Dreamweaver well we have Eclipse or UltraEdit,
I don't think Eclipse or UltraEdit are viable options for most
companies. There is that whole ideology that if it doesnt cost alot of
money, how good could it be? IMO Dreamweaver only really competes with
FrontPage (which isnt much competition outside of marketing on MS
part). VS is a viable
Actually Contribute is the type of product that I think they sell
large amounts of in bulk. It's aimed at content management for groups
large and small. Especially the large companies who use the
administrative tools in Contribute like connection keys to allow users
to have correct access to
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:45:25 -0500, Adrocknaphobia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think Eclipse or UltraEdit are viable options for most
companies. There is that whole ideology that if it doesnt cost alot of
money, how good could it be?
That's true, so we've now decided to charge 5 million
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:37:41 -0800, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:45:25 -0500, Adrocknaphobia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think Eclipse or UltraEdit are viable options for most
companies. There is that whole ideology that if it doesnt cost alot of
money, how good
Dreamweaver well we have Eclipse or UltraEdit, Visual Studio 2003, ..
etc..
All of those do some of the things that Dreamweaver does, but none of them
do all the things that Dreamweaver does! I don't think there's really a
comparable HTML authoring tool out there.
Products like RoboHelp,
12 matches
Mail list logo
