OT: Server ? for CF

2003-06-27 Thread Jeff Horne
<< Make the 2.4 GHz server the database server, it will give you the best growth-path (it is easier to serve many webservers from one database server as one webserver from many database servers). >> Thanks Jochem. I failed to say that we've got a one to one website to database relationship. O

Re: OT: Server ? for CF

2003-06-27 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Jeff Horne wrote: > << How large are the databases? >> > > Not very large. 474mb for all. > << Are your databases CPU bound or I/O bound? >> > > I/O bound. Why are you I/O bound when you should have enough RAM to cache all databases completely? Make the 2.4 GHz server the database server, it

OT: Server ? for CF

2003-06-27 Thread Jeff Horne
<< How large are the databases? >> Not very large. 474mb for all. << What are the specs of the disks? >> I'm not sure what you mean. << Are your databases CPU bound or I/O bound? >> I/O bound. Thanks, Jeff ~| Archives: http

Re: OT: Server ? for CF

2003-06-27 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Horne, Jeff wrote: > We have two servers to choose from for loading CF. One is a current CF > webserver, the other is a new webserver that will be used for MySQL > databases. My dilema is, since I have the option now, which one do I want > to run CF on? I can switch them around and run either pi

OT: Server ? for CF

2003-06-27 Thread Horne, Jeff
We have two servers to choose from for loading CF. One is a current CF webserver, the other is a new webserver that will be used for MySQL databases. My dilema is, since I have the option now, which one do I want to run CF on? I can switch them around and run either piece on either server. Th