This will be on a dev server available to them. Basically I don't want
them to have access to everything thing in the database. Just the
tables they need.
I guess I could export the just the tables they need rather than a
complete backup of the database.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:25:09 +0100, Thomas
That's what we do here - although, not being from a security background, I
am not positive that this is the best way. But others that I know of give
read-only access this way, too. So, you would not be alone.
Ray
At 11:17 AM 6/30/2004, you wrote:
>I have a developer that needs access to a data
On Wednesday 30 Jun 2004 16:17 pm, Phill B wrote:
> I have a developer that needs access to a database. They suggested I
> Here's my question. Wouldn't it be better to just create a user
> account that has read only access to the tables that they will be
> working with?
Except then he'll be workin
I have a developer that needs access to a database. They suggested I
give them a backup of it that they can work with. My first thought was
OK but then I started thinking about it. I don't like the thought of
some one having a complete copy of my database.
Here's my question. Wouldn't it be better
4 matches
Mail list logo