July 18, 2003 1:44 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Pros/Cons of Hub & Spoke (Was: Cons to Fusebox)
>
>
> On Thursday, Jul 17, 2003, at 13:08 US/Pacific, Mosh Teitelbaum wrote:
> > First, thanks to Brian for the dialogue concerning the pros and cons of
> > Fusebox. I i
On Thursday, Jul 17, 2003, at 13:08 US/Pacific, Mosh Teitelbaum wrote:
> First, thanks to Brian for the dialogue concerning the pros and cons of
> Fusebox. I intend to keep at that line of conversation in the thread.
It's an interesting thread.
>> From your own experiences and your own thoughts
Sorry I don't have time to answer each question right now but one thing just sort of
'spark's an idea. Please see below.
>> Code Clarity and Conciseness, hence Readibility
>
>How does this design improve code clarity and conciseness over that of other
>designs? Can you give me some examples?
>
> Code Clarity and Conciseness, hence Readibility
How does this design improve code clarity and conciseness over that of other
designs? Can you give me some examples?
> Benefits: for application debugging, team collaboration,
> maintenance, future functional enhancements, presentation
> modifica
I would say, I can see some benefits right out there when using "Hub and Spoke
Architecture" or similar Architectural Framework.
Code Clarity and Conciseness, hence Readibility
Benefits: for application debugging, team collaboration, maintenance, future
functional enhancements, presentation modif
First, thanks to Brian for the dialogue concerning the pros and cons of
Fusebox. I intend to keep at that line of conversation in the thread.
However, my original question was not specific to Fusebox but to the
benefits of one design feature of Fusebox (and other frameworks),
specifically, use of
6 matches
Mail list logo
