Re: 3 Cells Wide

2003-02-21 Thread Ewok
> > > #queryName.subCategoryName# > > More... > > subCategoryCount=subCategoryCount+1> > > > > > > > > > There may be a more efficient way of doing what you proposed, but this > gets the job done. > > Best, > > Nathan > > > &

RE: 3 Cells Wide

2003-02-21 Thread Guy McDowell
t; There may be a more efficient way of doing what you proposed, > but this gets the job done. > > Best, > > Nathan > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Guy McDowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:26 AM > >

RE: 3 Cells Wide

2003-02-21 Thread Nathan Mische
>subCategoryCount=subCategoryCount+1> > > > > > > > > > There may be a more efficient way of doing what you proposed, > but this gets the job done. > > Best, > > Nathan > > > > -----Ori

Re: 3 Cells Wide

2003-02-21 Thread Guy McDowell
Hi Dave (and everyone else), I've got the grouping and ordering down, it's the formatting of the output that's the challenge. The trick is to get my HTML table only 3 cols wide and then only have the first 3 results of the query on the Subcategory table displayed under the appropriate Category hea

Re: 3 Cells Wide

2003-02-21 Thread Dave Carabetta
>This is a borderline newbie question. Perhaps we should have a >CF-Brainfart list. Anyway > >Challenge: To have out put from two tables put into a three column >wide, n-rows deep HTML table a la Yahoo! Each column's formatted output >would look something like this: > >Category Name > >Subcateg