> I have this book and I really like it. It has explained OO
> stuff in a way that I actually understood it. I have learned alot.
Just as a note, I would say that anyone who already has a grounding in
OO programming is not really going to get much out of Hal's book. I
received it last week and w
CFCs by Hal Helms?
Too bad about the frameworks, but the book sounds really interesing. I went
ahead and ordered it.
Thanks,
-Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: John Quarto-vonTivadar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 4:23 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subje
Too bad about the frameworks, but the book sounds really interesing. I went
ahead and ordered it.
Thanks,
-Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: John Quarto-vonTivadar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 4:23 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Anybody h
On Wednesday, Mar 19, 2003, at 15:18 US/Pacific, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A point that Hal Helms brought out in this book on page 153 in
> paragraph 345 has to do with a CFC bug that prevents output from a CFC
> method in a shared scope variable when you call the method more
I agree with John this is a good book for easing procedural programming thinking into
OO concepts. As far as CFC's go I have not seen anything better than this book for
that. Hal comes up with some work-arounds where CFC's currently lack.
Kind Regards - Mike Brunt
Original Message ---
It does not cover application frameworks, only CFCs themselves.
It does not assume any OO knowledge at all. In fact, it's a pretty darn
good intro to the subject, since CFCs are OO-like rather than true OO,
so Helms just covers the important concepts you'll have to learn in any
OO language
It doe
6 matches
Mail list logo
