> When you say "disk based" - you mean like System.IO file & directory
> interaction? If that's the case, I highly recommend .NET. It tends to be
> remarkably fast in this category.
I guess I could have been a little less vague on the projects - We
have two "systems" that we use for our in-house b
WFP is the future and is where MS is focusing their development
efforts. WFP is highly regarded by those that are using it, except it
has a high learning curve and WPF projects often require a
professional graphic designer on the project. The WPF Unleashed book
gets rave reviews as a good way to le
more intuitive than regular desktop applications...
!k
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Strutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 3:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Anyone played with WPF (Windows Presentation Framework)?
I've played with it just a bit. It can drop
I've played with it just a bit. It can drop out some fairly nice interfaces
and the XML is pretty well structured in the way that everything seems to
make sense and skill translation from HTML+CSS is not that difficult.
I decided not to use it, however, as the thing I was playing with is a wide
re
4 matches
Mail list logo
