Google does treat SES URLs slightly differently in that it will spider pages at
a significantly slower rate if it thinks the pages are dynamic. It is designed
that way so that it doesn't bring the site down by over enthusiastic spidering.
I redeveloped an existing application into fusebox, so
: 25 April 2005 13:34
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?
I use a custom 404 handler that does a database lookup from a table of
vanity URLs. It evaluates the last value of a list separated by / and
searches the database for the url...
Simple enough
Yeah, I think search engines are happier about querystrings now, but:
We have customers who put their URLs in printed marketing materials, so
there is no way we are going to have users typing in:
/index.cfm?page=79797C25-1143-5A57-54B333CF7325EA9C
We need to have direct access like
, April 25, 2005 6:18 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?
Yeah, I think search engines are happier about querystrings now, but:
We have customers who put their URLs in printed marketing materials, so
there is no way we are going to have users typing in:
/index.cfm
Subject: RE: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?
I use a custom 404 handler that does a database lookup from a table of
vanity URLs. It evaluates the last value of a list separated by / and
searches the database for the url...
Simple enough for me.
HTH,
Jeff
-Original
On 4/25/05, Jeff Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use a custom 404 handler that does a database lookup from a table of
vanity URLs. It evaluates the last value of a list separated by / and
searches the database for the url...
You realise that when a search engine hits a 404 it turns around
Couldn't you combine it with a cfheader statuscode=200 or something
though?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 April 2005 14:44
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?
Jeff,
While that works, doesn't
My point exactly ;-)
~k
-Original Message-
From: Kay Smoljak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 April 2005 13:44
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?
On 4/25/05, Jeff Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use a custom 404 handler that does
Al Everett wrote:
For those of you taking a lot of time getting your dynamic site URLs
to look like static ones, this article may be of interest to you:
http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/4/emw232456.htm
(I am in no way affiliated with the site. It just happened to come up
in a
I use a similar setup to Jeff purely for search engine optimisation. You can
set the HTTP status code to 200 and googlebot does index.
Another point is that while google may index sites with complex URL's this in
itself does not constitute search engine optimisation but rather is just a
Message -
From: Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?
On 4/25/05, Jeff Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use a custom 404 handler that does a database lookup from
This is an excellent product for SEF URLS:
http://helicontech.com/linkfreeze/
Best part about it is that you do not have to modify your existing url key
pair schema.
Just my 2 cents.
Phil
---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses.]
12 matches
Mail list logo
