Re: BlueDragon cfinclude issues

2004-08-20 Thread Dick Applebaum
uys at NewAtlanta >  today, but I'm actually liking it quite a lot so far. Even the > problems >  I've had have been pretty simple to fix. > >_   > >  From: Alexander Sherwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >  Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:20 AM >  

RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues

2004-08-20 Thread Ken Ferguson
ding them over to the guys at NewAtlanta today, but I'm actually liking it quite a lot so far. Even the problems I've had have been pretty simple to fix.   _   From: Alexander Sherwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:20 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: BlueD

Re: converting to BD (was RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues)

2004-08-19 Thread Adam Haskell
Big warning though if you use XMLsearch In BD don't expect to get the same results in MX if you are using functions... count(//*) works great in BD not so much in MX...that being said if anyone has a work around for it other than using Stuct functions on the XML object let me know. I am working on

converting to BD (was RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues)

2004-08-19 Thread Matt Liotta
> It's just that I've had so many issues with BD and functions. I seem to > have been forced to rework every single one of them in the move from > CFMX. They're all flying well on my prod server which runs MX, but they > fail on BD for any number of reasons. So, in the end, I'm not sure if > I'm go

RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues

2004-08-19 Thread Matt Liotta
st 19, 2004 11:12 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues > > Matt, > > Yes but... fileexists requires the fule path (i.e. e:\wwwroot\index.cfm - > not just "index.cfm") so I would definitley > expect the cfif to return FALSE - or am I miss

RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues

2004-08-19 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG
full path not "fule"   -Original Message-   From: Mark A. Kruger - CFG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:12 AM   To: CF-Talk   Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues   Matt,   Yes but... fileexists requires the fule path (i.e. e:\wwwroot\index

RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues

2004-08-19 Thread Alexander Sherwood
At 11:09 AM 8/19/2004, you wrote: >I didn't think it through very well before posting. I just got >frustrated and asked. > > So, in the end, I'm not sure if >I'm going to be switching over to BD at all. Why switch to begin with? Do you need functionality in BD that is not in CFMX, or is it the pr

RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues

2004-08-19 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG
August 19, 2004 10:05 AM   To: CF-Talk   Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues   In testing locally I found that FileExists() seems to be the problem.   Basically, nothing inside the cfif executes. Simply including a template   based on a variable without checking to see if it exists works.   In

RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues

2004-08-19 Thread Jim Davis
, that the error message is less than specific.  ;^) Jim Davis   _   From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:49 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues Nope, same result. Also, #variables.incfilename# gives the same value as #evaluate

RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues

2004-08-19 Thread Ken Ferguson
to waste everyone's time, he says walking away feeling like a total moron. --Ferg   _   From: Mark A. Kruger - CFG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:53 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues You are not modifying it for path so "fileexis

RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues

2004-08-19 Thread Matt Liotta
will be included. -Matt > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Ken Ferguson > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:43 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues > > Right, first I had , but it > yi

RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues

2004-08-19 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG
You are not modifying it for path so "fileexists( )" should crap out - unless BD does relative paths... does it? Also - what's with the "evaluate( )" function? Seems superflous to me. -mk   -Original Message-   From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004

RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues

2004-08-19 Thread Ken Ferguson
From: Scott Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:42 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: BlueDragon cfinclude issues You have this block: ... I think the issue is that you're testing to see if "Evaluate(variables.incfilename)" exists, but then y

RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues

2004-08-19 Thread Ken Ferguson
z and Floyd http://www.fitzandfloyd.com http://www.exclusivelyfitz.com http://stores.ebay.com/fitzandfloydscharmingtails   _   From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:40 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues Maybe I am readin

Re: BlueDragon cfinclude issues

2004-08-19 Thread Scott Brady
You have this block: ... I think the issue is that you're testing to see if "Evaluate(variables.incfilename)" exists, but then you're only including "variables.incfilename".  Try template="#Evaluate(variables.incfilename)#" >  Instead. Or, better yet, find a way to get rid

RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues

2004-08-19 Thread Matt Liotta
Maybe I am reading the following line wrong, but it looks like you are trying to evaluate the filename as a variable. Shouldn't the above be as follows? -Matt [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]