Re: CF Inline Documentation Methodology

2000-03-24 Thread Fred Sanders
day, March 24, 2000 9:43 AM Subject: RE: CF Inline Documentation Methodology > I think what your looking for is FuseDoc. > > http://www.teamallaire.com/hal/ > -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/

RE: CF Inline Documentation Methodology

2000-03-24 Thread Nornes, Ross M (James Tower)
Mike Murry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 9:44 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: CF Inline Documentation Methodology I think what your looking for is FuseDoc. http://www.teamallaire.com/hal/ Mike Murry Web Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 214.599.5290 I read somew

RE: CF Inline Documentation Methodology

2000-03-24 Thread Sean Brown
-Original Message- From: Eddie Shipman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 11:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CF Inline Documentation Methodology First...I can't find any spec tool at fusebox.org... http://www.teamallaire.co

RE: CF Inline Documentation Methodology

2000-03-24 Thread Mike Murry
I think what your looking for is FuseDoc. http://www.teamallaire.com/hal/ Mike Murry Web Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 214.599.5290 I read somewhere on the net about a group that has figured out a way to comment their code in such a way so that they can run a parser against their code base and t

RE: CF Inline Documentation Methodology

2000-03-24 Thread Eddie Shipman
First...I can't find any spec tool at fusebox.org... Second, I wish everyone would QUIT SENDING HTML MAIL TO THE LIST!!! And, third...would list members, please, trim their message > >Sounds a bit like the spec tool at www.fusebox.org. Which >incidentally is >fixing to get an overhaul an

Re: CF Inline Documentation Methodology

2000-03-24 Thread Fred Sanders
Sounds a bit like the spec tool at www.fusebox.org. Which incidentally is fixing to get an overhaul and revamp soon. Fred - Original Message - From: "Nornes, Ross M (James Tower)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Cftalk (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 8:58 AM Subject: