Yeap and every place I have talked to and every person I know who does it
continuly runs into MS shops that want and expect their programmers to be
using the MS tools.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think it would be career suicide to not learn Visu
> I think it would be career suicide to not learn Visual
> Studio if embarking down the path of being a .NET
> developer. I am going to make a guess here but I do not
> think doing .NET development is what you do for a primary
> source of income to put food on the table.
There are plenty of C# de
I think it would be career suicide to not learn Visual Studio if embarking
down the path of being a .NET developer. I am going to make a guess here
but I do not think doing .NET development is what you do for a primary
source of income to put food on the table.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Da
> I learned C# and Visual Studio at the same time, kind of have to have one to
> do the other.
No, you can write C# with whatever you like. I like the (free)
SharpDevelop.NET IDE, myself. But if you plan to use Visual Studio,
you can certainly learn them simultaneously.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf
I learned C# and Visual Studio at the same time, kind of have to have one to
do the other.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 1:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. So it sounds like learning C# is a good place to get started.
> Thanks all. Would anyone recommend a g
Ok. So it sounds like learning C# is a good place to get started.
Thanks all. Would anyone recommend a good path or order for tackling
it all? Is learning C# the best idea? Should I get more familiar with
Visual Dev product first?
Thanks
>> I've played with both. VB is far more bloated tha
> C Sharp?
> Visual Basic?
I've played with both. VB is far more bloated than C#, but VB is also used
for developing Windows applications.
If you are going to be developing only for web, then C# is far more compact
and clean. If you are also going to be developing Windows applications, VB
is mor
> I've played with both. VB is far more bloated than C#, but VB is also used
> for developing Windows applications.
So is C#. Anything you can do with one .NET language, you can do with another.
> If you are going to be developing only for web, then C# is far more compact
> and clean. If you are
http://www.asp.net/learn/ is a good place to start. I recommend the
video tutorials.
If your company has already made the decision to go with .NET then
there is a good chance that the person that made that decision has
already decided on the preferred programming language. Are you sure
you have a c
I would not mess with VB and found a lot of people share that preference. I
have been through a couple of the .NET training courses and did not leave
all that impressed with the course. Felt like had I spent the same amount
of time with a book or two that I would have ultimately been much better
10 matches
Mail list logo
