On Thursday 21 Jun 2007, John Mason wrote:
> you may want to read up on your agreements. You may be legally required to
> follow points such as these.
Yeah, I think I posed the VISA requirements the other week.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to apprehensively participate leading-edge design-patterns
o
y much the only site I can't
have offline if I do something wild to the server and crap it out for
some reason.
-Original Message-
From: John Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 3:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF8 Ent Instances
Considering CF8 is still beta an
Definitely not the next myspace, one big site (the 600k/year) and the
others are small blogs/wikis etc. Nothing over the 100k/year mark.
I agree that the answer depends on the number of simultaneous users, how
much RAM each application needs to function well, and other
application-specific facto
ginal Message-
From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 11:21 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF8 Ent Instances
On Thursday 21 Jun 2007, Cutter (CFRelated) wrote:
> issues. Every 'expert' I've ever spoken with on this would agree with
> puttin
> > issues. Every 'expert' I've ever spoken with on this would
> > agree with putting the db on a separate box, behind the firewall ...
>
> That's massive overkill for most people's applications, I expect.
As is running multiple instances of CF8.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.fi
Tom Chiverton wrote:
> On Thursday 21 Jun 2007, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
As a side note, putting a database server on the same box is a bad move.
The web server and database server should be separate to obtain the best
in security and utilization of your hardware.
>>> I believe this
On Thursday 21 Jun 2007, Cutter (CFRelated) wrote:
> issues. Every 'expert' I've ever spoken with on this would agree with
> putting the db on a separate box, behind the firewall, and without
> direct access to the net, utilizing full authenticated-only access from
> specific sources within the int
-Original Message-
From: Mike Chabot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 10:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF8 Ent Instances
Assuming the data is important and needs to be secure, then you are correct.
However, not all data is important. The server these guys were d
Assuming the data is important and needs to be secure, then you are
correct. However, not all data is important. The server these guys
were describing was unlikely to have anything remotely sensitive on
it, which is why they were comfortable running everything on one box.
I should have clarified th
It may chew up less resources, but that doesn't get around the security
issues. Every 'expert' I've ever spoken with on this would agree with
putting the db on a separate box, behind the firewall, and without
direct access to the net, utilizing full authenticated-only access from
specific sourc
On Thursday 21 Jun 2007, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> >> As a side note, putting a database server on the same box is a bad move.
> >> The web server and database server should be separate to obtain the best
> >> in security and utilization of your hardware.
> >
> > I believe this statement is more t
Mike Chabot wrote:
> On 6/20/07, John Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> As a side note, putting a database server on the same box is a bad move. The
>> web server and database server should be separate to obtain the best in
>> security and utilization of your hardware.
>
> I believe this sta
On 6/20/07, John Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Considering CF8 is still beta and we don't know the applications you are
> trying to run on this. The answer is it depends.
I agree that the answer depends on the number of simultaneous users,
how much RAM each application needs to function well,
Considering CF8 is still beta and we don't know the applications you are
trying to run on this. The answer is it depends.
As a side note, putting a database server on the same box is a bad move. The
web server and database server should be separate to obtain the best in
security and utilization of
14 matches
Mail list logo
