RE: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-18 Thread Damien McKenna
If anyone is having problems with this I suggest simply re-extracting the files. I had a previous installation of eclipse I forgot to remove before extracting the files, so when I started it up it didn't want to work for me. A simple delete-reextract later and it's all groovy. -- Damien

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Dwayne Cole
I already have CFeclipse, thus Eclipse (only the required items, what ever this means), installed. Can I download your version and just install over the one that I have? -- Original Message -- From: Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To:

RE: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Damien McKenna
A _huge_ thanks, Rob. As has been mentioned before, any chance of setting up an announcements mailing list so we can keep up-to-date with changes? -- Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Limu Company - http://www.thelimucompany.com/ - 407-804-1014 #include stdjoke.h

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Rob Munn
Cool. I fixed my config. today. I had to uninstall my JRE and re-install it. I have been using CFE most of the day and I'm mostly digging it. The color coder needs refining, I submitted a bug on it. I saw another color coding bug, but I lost track of it. The lack of line wrap in the editor is a

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread JediHomer
I've just started to play with it and so far the major thing i miss from Homesite (assuming i just havnt seen it ) is the ability to click on a CFINCLUDE and go to/edit that file On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 01:29:29 -0800, Rob Munn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cool. I fixed my config. today. I had to

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Mark Drew
Right click on it .. you might have to have saved the file I implemented this and it even works better than DW as if the file doesnt exist you can even go and create it (which I do a lot of in Fusebox) MD On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:21:58 +, JediHomer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just started

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Nathan Strutz
Believe it or not, that features *is* in there. However, sometimes it's hard to find. Try saving your document first, CFE rebuilds the document structure when you save. Then it should be as easy as right-clicking on your cfinclude tag to get the Open/Create File option. If you find any bugs

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Spike
Hi Dwayne, Yes, you can just extract the zip from Robs site over the top of an existing Eclipse install and all should be well. Spike Dwayne Cole wrote: I already have CFeclipse, thus Eclipse (only the required items, what ever this means), installed. Can I download your version and just

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Spike
http://cfeclipse.tigris.org/servlets/ProjectMailingListList Top of that page - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spike Damien McKenna wrote: A _huge_ thanks, Rob. As has been mentioned before, any chance of setting up an announcements mailing list so we can keep up-to-date with changes? --

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Spike
Rob Munn wrote: Cool. *snip* One other thing, more a OT question about Eclipse maybe. In HS+ you can write Windows Script Host scripts and tie them into the IDE using shortcuts, etc. I have one that I use to insert a comment with my initials and the date. How would I go about re-creating

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Stan Winchester
I'm getting a file check error when I try to unzip the Windows version. Message: The computed CRC doesn't match the CRC recorded in the archive I've deleted the file re-downloaded 3-times and still get the same error. If you were thinking about trying cfeclpse, but didn't want to mess with the

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Spike
Just downloaded and extracted it fine from here. I'm guessing that you're having some sort of proxy caching issues. You might be able to force it to grab the latest version by adding a random URL variable: http://www.robrohan.com/blog/assets/cfeclipseXP_0.1.zip?foo=bar Spike Stan Winchester

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Jeff Fleitz
I am getting the very same error. ___ Jeff Fleitz Tekquest, Ltd Integrated Digital Solutions http://www.tekquest.com ___ Spike wrote: Just downloaded and extracted it fine from here. I'm guessing that you're having some sort of proxy

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Stan Winchester
I'm still getting the same error with the random URL variable. Just downloaded and extracted it fine from here. I'm guessing that you're having some sort of proxy caching issues. You might be able to force it to grab the latest version by adding a random URL variable:

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Rob
What unzipping program are you using? On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:43:22 -0400, Stan Winchester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting a file check error when I try to unzip the Windows version. Message: The computed CRC doesn't match the CRC recorded in the archive I've deleted the file

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Spike
I've put up a copy at: http://www.spike.org.uk/tmp/cfeclipse_bundle.zip Let me know if that one works. If not, I'll try re-zipping it with a different level of compression. Spike Stan Winchester wrote: I'm still getting the same error with the random URL variable. Just downloaded and

RE: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Damien McKenna
The original zip works for me. -- Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Limu Company - http://www.thelimucompany.com/ - 407-804-1014 #include stdjoke.h ~| Logware: a new and convenient web-based time tracking

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Joe Rinehart
Spike, Rob, I've been using CFEclipse exclusively for the past week. Just wanted to say it was a breeze to install, and it's been a joy to use so far. Thanks guys! -Joe On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:20:20 -0800, Spike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've put up a copy at:

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread JediHomer
yup... randomly just found it 30 seconds after posting goes and hides under rock again ;) On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:49:21 +0100, Mark Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right click on it .. you might have to have saved the file I implemented this and it even works better than DW as if the file

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Mark Drew
As Nathan mentioned, you have to save the file first.. no biggie but just so you know :) MD On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 20:14:00 +, JediHomer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yup... randomly just found it 30 seconds after posting goes and hides under rock again ;) On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:49:21

RE: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Paul
-Original Message- What unzipping program are you using? I experimented; it doesn't work using the built-in winXP zip utility, but winzip didn't complain at all. ~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's

RE: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Damien McKenna
Works fine with Directory Opus 8's built-in Zip support. -- Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Limu Company - http://www.thelimucompany.com/ - 407-804-1014 #include stdjoke.h -Original Message- From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Spike
ok, I used 7-zip (http://www.7-zip.org/) to create it and told it to use zip format and maximum compression. It could be that the XP default unzipper doesn't handle very high compression ratios too well. I did test that on my machine, but it could be that the 7-zip libraries are used instead

RE: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Paul
. Is that accurate? If so, how can I tell which one to keep and which to ditch? -Original Message- From: Spike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 12:20 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term) I've put up a copy at: http

RE: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Dave Merrill
Um, I downloaded this, no problem unzipping, but it appears to contain an entire eclipse install, some 43M+, with phpeclipse and not cfeclipse. Wasn't this supposed to be an update of cfeclipse, only? Have I fallen through into some alternate reality? Dave Merrill I've put up a copy at:

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Stan Winchester
I also found it would not use the XP zip or V-Com (formerly Ontrack) PowerDesk. I downloaded winzip and it worked fine. -Original Message- What unzipping program are you using? I experimented; it doesn't work using the built-in winXP zip utility, but winzip didn't complain at all.

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Spike
Hi Dave, I think you might have got your wires crossed. This is a bundled package including Eclipse, cfeclipse, phpeclipse and a few other generally useful plugins. A new nightly build of cfeclipse should be available in the next week or so. Spike Dave Merrill wrote: Um, I downloaded this,

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Nathan Strutz
Yep, alternate reality. CFE is now over 40 mb. And tomorrow MM is upgrading their site to PHP 2.0, and have sold their stocks to the pottery barn. Bill gates started a blog. Oracle changed their mind on PeopleSoft. Ben just married J-Lo. Seriously though, read Rob's first post in this thread:

RE: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Dave Merrill
Oops. Just saw Mark's mentions of cool new features, and that it was available at spike's. But I bet that's just a teeny bit obvious at this point... Dave Merrill Yep, alternate reality. CFE is now over 40 mb. And tomorrow MM is upgrading their site to PHP 2.0, and have sold their stocks to

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Jeff Fleitz
My problem was with the built-in XP utility. Sorry about that. ___ Jeff Fleitz Tekquest, Ltd Integrated Digital Solutions http://www.tekquest.com ___ Spike wrote: ok, I used 7-zip (http://www.7-zip.org/) to create it and told it to

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Robert Munn
I am very tempted to get involved, but I will be the first to admit that desktop Java development is not my forte and I have very little real knowledge of the Eclipse platform. However, my company uses Eclipse as both an IDE and a client platform for our products, so I have every motivation to

Re: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-17 Thread Spike
Excellent! Feel free to fire me questions off list any time you like. I'd suggest taking a look at a few of the articles on http://www.eclipse.org and getting familiar with the general architecture. Once you've done that, go right ahead and grab the source code from CVS. If there's a bug or

RE: CFEclipse Stuido (for lack of a better term)

2005-01-16 Thread James Holmes
The Other One lol. I've used quantum with the Oracle thin driver and that also works fine - is adding that to the bundle a violation of Oracle's licence or is it worth considering? -Original Message- From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 17 January 2005 2:08 PM To: CF-Talk