Re: CFHeader and jpegs

2001-06-05 Thread Tania.Lawrie
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05-06-2001 05:44:02 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Re: CFHeader and jpegs Try removing the line altogether. Another idea would be do mark the jpgs as "image/jpeg", instead of "image/pjp

RE: CFHeader and jpegs

2001-06-05 Thread Tony Schreiber
Does it have anything to do with the fact that jpg's get decompressed to bitmaps and that's what IE thinks they are? > > Question: Is there anything that could confuse a header into > > thinking that it should be publishing a jpg file as a bitmap? > > If your using IE - its Just Broken in that

Re: CFHeader and jpegs

2001-06-05 Thread Peter Janett
Try removing the line altogether. Another idea would be do mark the jpgs as "image/jpeg", instead of "image/pjpeg". Maybe the browser doesn't like the progressive part of the jpg image type header. Just some random ideas, Peter Janett New Media One Web Services ==

RE: CFHeader and jpegs

2001-06-05 Thread Thomas Chiverton
> Question: Is there anything that could confuse a header into > thinking that it should be publishing a jpg file as a bitmap? If your using IE - its Just Broken in that regard, though a few posts on here in the last few weeks concerned with donwloading files may help - check the archives. ~~