RE: CFML vs. Javascript

2000-06-28 Thread Dave Watts
> ... You shouldn't be using either JavaScript or CFML to do any > kind of aggravated functions. I hate it when functions aggravate me. Sorry, I couldn't resist. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444

RE: CFML vs. Javascript

2000-06-28 Thread Mark Warrick
JavaScript is great for what you're trying to do. My rule of thumb is that you use JavaScript only for non-mission-critical applications. ---mark -- Mark Warrick Phone: (714) 547-5386 Efax.com Fax: (801) 730-7289 Personal Email: [EMAI

RE: CFML vs. Javascript

2000-06-28 Thread Dan G. Switzer, II
George, JavaScript can really help you to develop more scalable applications, by offloading the processing from the server to the client. As for what should be done by CF and JavaScript, it really varies. On of the really nice things about writing for IE5+, is that you can actually update specif

RE: CFML vs. Javascript

2000-06-28 Thread Philip Arnold - ASP
> What is a good rule of thumb for when to use CFML and when to use > Javascript > when both will accomplish the same thing? We develop management > information > reports and applications for a very large intranet which has > standardized on > MSIE 4/5 and Pentium PII/III PCs with WinNT 4.0 and 32

Re: CFML vs. Javascript

2000-06-28 Thread Dick Applebaum
Interesting question... Some things to consider (in no particular order): 1. CFML is probably a better choice for manipulating SQL query data because it has tags (cfoutput, cfloop, etc.) which are designed to work with/augment the SQL query results (grouping, indexing an entire row, etc.). 2

RE: CFML vs. Javascript

2000-06-28 Thread Stewart McGowan
Personally i'd do the summing grouping etc on the dB server, and have more simple queries at the client end. Stew > -Original Message- > From: Earl, George [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 28 June 2000 12:22 > To: 'Listserv, Cold Fusion' > Subject: CFML vs. Javascript > > What is