RE: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible version available

2004-04-19 Thread Daniel Mackey
great tool. If you have not tried it yet, now is the time to use it ;-) Regards, Dan.   -Original Message-   From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 00:05   To: CF-Talk   Subject: RE: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible version available   For sec

RE: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible version available

2004-04-16 Thread Dave Watts
> "security reasons"?  Meaning port 3306 is open on your > firewall, so you switch to a port that isn't open?  There's a > reason for port standardization.  Not to say that CFMyAdmin > shouldn't allow for alternate ports but the reason for using > should be multiple separate servers on a single

RE: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible version available

2004-04-16 Thread Matt Robertson
snapped.  It's been a bad (and horrendously long) week. But it's Friday afternoon. > -Original Message- > From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 4:33 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible version

RE: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible version available

2004-04-16 Thread Barney Boisvert
Coo' coo'.  Sorry I snapped.  It's been a bad (and horrendously long) week. But it's Friday afternoon. > -Original Message- > From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 4:33 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMyAdmin

RE: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible version available

2004-04-16 Thread Matt Robertson
Barney Boisvert wrote: >the reason for using should be multiple separate servers on a >single machine, not security. Actually thats exactly the reason.  Multiple 'virtual' servers each running on a different port.  Security is the reason for doing this, along with politics, but didn't want to writ

RE: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible version available

2004-04-16 Thread Barney Boisvert
on a single machine, not security. > -Original Message- > From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 4:05 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible version available > > For security reasons I am not runn

RE: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible version available

2004-04-16 Thread Matt Robertson
For security reasons I am not running mySQL on its default port of 3306.  But this port appears to be hardcoded into the tool (there's no place to specify a port).   *sniffle* :( -- --- Matt Robertson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysec

RE: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible version available

2004-04-16 Thread Daniel Mackey
PROTECTED]   Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 21:14   To: CF-Talk   Subject: Re: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible version available   >Looking forward to hearing your views and comments,   Dan,   I'm just starting to play with it, but wanted to immediately mention that the app seemed co

RE: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible version available

2004-04-16 Thread Daniel Mackey
Roger, This is fixed in the new version. Sorry about that. I have emailed you offlist also. Regards, Dan.   -Original Message-   From: Roger Benningfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 21:20   To: CF-Talk   Subject: Re: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible

Re: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible version available

2004-04-16 Thread Roger Benningfield
And a new error: "UDI Version 3.8 requires a licence to be purchased to allow its use on myserver.com" This after right-clicking on a column name and selecting "View Data". And now I note that any attempt to click a column or table name now results in the same error until I: (a) hit the browser

Re: CFMyAdmin Update - New MX compatible version available

2004-04-16 Thread Roger Benningfield
>Looking forward to hearing your views and comments, Dan, I'm just starting to play with it, but wanted to immediately mention that the app seemed completely broken on my first attempt to run it. (CFMX, Firefox on the client.) I got a CF error in the right-hand frame, and the tree control would i