Re: Cfparam question

2005-11-18 Thread Aaron Rouse
Again I was not talking about a form submitting to itself. As far as my comment about not doing params at all, I was referencing doing them for any of the FORM scope but figured that was obvious by this point. On 11/17/05, Bobby Hartsfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > nor was I talking about

RE: Cfparam question

2005-11-17 Thread Bobby Hartsfield
r 17, 2005 11:41 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Cfparam question You are not following what I am describing, we are talking about two seperate scenarios entirely. I was not talking about a form submitting to itself nor was I talking about doing any params at all. On 11/17/05, Bobby Hartsfield <[E

Re: Cfparam question

2005-11-17 Thread Aaron Rouse
You are not following what I am describing, we are talking about two seperate scenarios entirely. I was not talking about a form submitting to itself nor was I talking about doing any params at all. On 11/17/05, Bobby Hartsfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Again, an all around bad idea. Why bot

RE: Cfparam question

2005-11-17 Thread Bobby Hartsfield
se [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 10:38 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Cfparam question It does work, our POS framework at work does it. A query with zero record count returns blanks for the fields. At the top of a form that is used for both input and updating a query

Re: Cfparam question

2005-11-17 Thread Aaron Rouse
It does work, our POS framework at work does it. A query with zero record count returns blanks for the fields. At the top of a form that is used for both input and updating a query can run to pull out all the fields and then a cfparam just needs to be done on the PK so that by default it is equal t

RE: Cfparam question

2005-11-17 Thread Bobby Hartsfield
rsday, November 17, 2005 4:22 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Cfparam question If you did want the value to be that of what is in the database. Why not just put it in the html tags, when the query returned a zero record count you would get blank values put in so an empty form. When it returned the record

Re: Cfparam question

2005-11-17 Thread Aaron Rouse
If you did want the value to be that of what is in the database. Why not just put it in the html tags, when the query returned a zero record count you would get blank values put in so an empty form. When it returned the record then you get what was populated/inserted. On 11/17/05, Bobby Hartsfield

RE: Cfparam question

2005-11-17 Thread Bobby Hartsfield
ssage- From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 3:36 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Cfparam question I've done this before. In my admin pages, MOST of the text fields are tied directly to database fields of the same name. In the edit portion of the code,

RE: Cfparam question

2005-11-17 Thread Andy Matthews
I've done this before. In my admin pages, MOST of the text fields are tied directly to database fields of the same name. In the edit portion of the code, I select all of the information for that record, then use the columnlist attribute of the cfquery to loop over a cfparam tag like so:

Re: Cfparam question

2005-11-16 Thread Charlie Griefer
see my previous response :) basically you really only need to param checkboxes and radio button groups that don't have a button checked by default. On 11/16/05, Mike | NZSolutions Ltd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This seems to work... > > > > > > However, the radio items (no radio item is init

RE: Cfparam question

2005-11-16 Thread Mike | NZSolutions Ltd
This seems to work... However, the radio items (no radio item is initially selected for any question) are not passed through to the form. -Original Message- From: Mike | NZSolutions Ltd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 17 November 2005 12:39 p.m. To: CF-Talk Subject: Cfparam

Re: Cfparam question

2005-11-16 Thread Charlie Griefer
sure. assuming the fields are named appropriately... would set form.field1 - form.field30 to empty default values. but unless they're checkboxes (or radio groups with no buttons checked), they'll still get passed with empty values. an empty will pass an empty string to the action page

RE: CFPARAM Question

2002-01-31 Thread Ben Forta
No, writes the variable only if it does not exist, so the second will never get executed. What you have is essentially this: --- Ben -Original Message- From: Tony Schreiber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:06 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFPARAM Que

Re: CFPARAM Question

2002-01-31 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Nope it would not overwrite. CFPARAM works like this: If the variable does not exist it will create it and set whatever default value you specify. So when the second CFPARAM is called it will NOT create the var and a set a value because it already exists. To reset the var use CFSET in place

RE: CFPARAM Question

2002-01-31 Thread Cantrell, Adam
> Is there a way to duplicate my intended behavior another way? Yes, don't use cfparam in the second instance, use a condition. That will, in essence, param the variable to "boo" if the variable hadn't been touched since the initial param. > -Original Message- > From: Tony

RE: CFPARAM Question

2002-01-31 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG
CF Param is working as it's supposed to. CFPARAM encapsulates the follow ing logic: Your first cfparam does this IF ( NOT IsDefined('foo') ) { foo = bar; } Your second one does this. IF ( NOT IsDefined('foo') ) { foo = boo; } The first one executes and defines foo and assigns

RE: CFPARAM Question

2002-01-31 Thread Andrew Tyrone
> -Original Message- > From: Tony Schreiber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:06 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: CFPARAM Question > Do subsequent CFPARAMS of the same variable overwrite each other? I > thought so, but they don't seem to. > > > > .. later ... > >

RE: CFPARAM Question

2002-01-31 Thread Adkins, Randy
The reason that the second CFPARAM will not process as it states IF FOO does not exist, then set it to BOO However when the first instant was encounter FOO was defaulted to: BAR Thus now FOO exists and the 2nd PARAM will not be executed. What are you trying to do??? If you need foo to be BOO

RE: CFPARAM Question

2002-01-31 Thread Raymond Camden
Right - think about it - cfparam says, "If foo doesn't exist, make it." So, only the first cfparam will do anything. === Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Macromedia Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo IM

RE: cfparam question

2000-08-28 Thread Milks, Jim
Terribly sorry all! I did eroneously include pound signs in the name. Lashings complete... JM -Original Message- From: Zachary Bedell To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Sent: 28/08/00 1:49 PM Subject: RE: cfparam question -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Pound sign

RE: cfparam question

2000-08-28 Thread Zachary Bedell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Pound signs! > default="#qGetCorpInfo.CorporateName#">, Too many pound signs! The variable name is assumed to be a string, so this will probably cause the same problem as the IsDefined thingus from last week... Try this instead... I'm not su

RE: cfparam question

2000-08-28 Thread Olive, Christopher M Mr NMR
TED]] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 1:29 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: cfparam question Pound signs! , -Original Message- From: Stas Newdel To: CFTalk Sent: 28/08/00 1:23 PM Subject: cfparam question Hello, I'm trying to do this: , and the variable doesn

RE: cfparam question

2000-08-28 Thread Milks, Jim
Pound signs! , -Original Message- From: Stas Newdel To: CFTalk Sent: 28/08/00 1:23 PM Subject: cfparam question Hello, I'm trying to do this: , and the variable doesn't get set a value, it is initialized as blank. qGetCorpInfo is a query and it does return a record. Basically, I ju