James you could well be right, it may actually be quicker to download
and then ignore the additional emails as opposed to constantly
opening/closing connections to the mail server - I would test both
options and see which one performs better.
Kola
-Original Message-
From: James Smith
Thanks, that is what I am in the process of doing now, I was more wondering
if there were any protocol issues here where one method would be considered
more propper than the other.
_
From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 June 2004 11:32
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFPOP
I'm not sure which version of CF you are using but on CF4.x/5 the
getheaderonly action actually retrieved the entire mail although it didn't
present it all in the query so for what you are doing, a single pass is
probably preferable under the circumstances outlined above... I haven't
really played
server
HTH
KOla
-Original Message-
From: James Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 June 2004 11:37
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFPOP streamlining
Thanks, that is what I am in the process of doing now, I was more
wondering
if there were any protocol issues here where one method
In this case I am using MX, but that in useful information to be filed in
the for future reference folder, cheers.
I'm not sure which version of CF you are using but on CF4.x/5
the getheaderonly action actually retrieved the entire mail
although it didn't present it all in the query so for
One thing that I came upon when using CFPOP and deciding which method to
use, is that if you are using CFMX there is a nasty bug that deals with
encoding. Check out
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg149313.html for
some information. I know Raymond Camden also wrote about this bug on
You could always use CFX_POP3 to fix the utf-7 issue...
http://www.web-architect.co.uk/downloads.cfm
Paul
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
7 matches
Mail list logo
