Jared Clinton wrote:
Mr. Parker wouldn't need to use a CFX if he was using CFMX. Java has zip util
functionality in its standard libraries.
But still only on a dedicated host, because cfobject and CreateObject()
should not be allowed in a shared environment.
Jochem
You could try cfexecute, as long as they had PKzip2.5 (dos version) available on the
hard drive somewhere.
Or you could ask them to install a gzip COM component (but it might cost money to buy,
as I cant see any free ones).
Jared Clinton
NEC Australia
-Original Message-
From:
You can use a command-line zip utility with CFEXECUTE. But, I would imagine
that if the host doesn't want you to use CFXs they also won't want you to
use CFEXECUTE. But it's something you can look into.
--
Mosh Teitelbaum
evoch, LLC
Tel: (301) 625-9191
Fax: (301) 933-3651
Email: [EMAIL
Which version of CF?
--
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, October 10, 2002, 7:54:29 PM, you wrote:
PK Can anyone point me in any direction on this please.
PK The store on our web site, fortunately a CF based product, is run by another
PK business area of the Corporation.
PK Recently
Subject: Re: CFX not allowed
Which version of CF?
--
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, October 10, 2002, 7:54:29 PM, you wrote:
PK Can anyone point me in any direction on this please.
PK The store on our web site, fortunately a CF based product, is run by
another
PK business area
82332000
PK m: 0418 806 166
PK **
PK -Original Message-
PK From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
PK Sent: Friday, 11 October 2002 10:08 AM
PK To: CF-Talk
PK Subject: Re: CFX not allowed
PK Which version of CF
: Re: CFX not allowed
Then I'll stick with Jared's recommendations. Shelling out using
cfexecute (free), or use a zip com object (not free), like the one
from Xceed, would be the easiest way.
Although...the real issue is that you are on a shared host who is
restricting you. Why not move
Subject: RE: CFX not allowed
Thanks Jon - dedicated was my immediate reaction when they told me the news
but when I told the business area they'd have to fund it because I wasn't
funded for it, they suggested we look for some other options first. I did
canvass MX with the developer on the chance it did
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFX not allowed
Thanks Jon - dedicated was my immediate reaction when they told me the news
but when I told the business area they'd have to fund it because I wasn't
funded for it, they suggested we look for some other options first. I did
canvass MX with the developer
. Until then I'm not really
doing anything in MX I haven't done in previous versions.
Cheers!
-Original Message-
From: Jared Clinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 11 October 2002 1:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFX not allowed
Peter,
Mr. Parker wouldn't need to use a CFX
10 matches
Mail list logo