Re: CFX not allowed

2002-10-11 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Jared Clinton wrote: Mr. Parker wouldn't need to use a CFX if he was using CFMX. Java has zip util functionality in its standard libraries. But still only on a dedicated host, because cfobject and CreateObject() should not be allowed in a shared environment. Jochem

RE: CFX not allowed

2002-10-10 Thread Jared Clinton
You could try cfexecute, as long as they had PKzip2.5 (dos version) available on the hard drive somewhere. Or you could ask them to install a gzip COM component (but it might cost money to buy, as I cant see any free ones). Jared Clinton NEC Australia -Original Message- From:

RE: CFX not allowed

2002-10-10 Thread Mosh Teitelbaum
You can use a command-line zip utility with CFEXECUTE. But, I would imagine that if the host doesn't want you to use CFXs they also won't want you to use CFEXECUTE. But it's something you can look into. -- Mosh Teitelbaum evoch, LLC Tel: (301) 625-9191 Fax: (301) 933-3651 Email: [EMAIL

Re: CFX not allowed

2002-10-10 Thread Jon Hall
Which version of CF? -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, October 10, 2002, 7:54:29 PM, you wrote: PK Can anyone point me in any direction on this please. PK The store on our web site, fortunately a CF based product, is run by another PK business area of the Corporation. PK Recently

RE: CFX not allowed

2002-10-10 Thread Parker, Kevin
Subject: Re: CFX not allowed Which version of CF? -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, October 10, 2002, 7:54:29 PM, you wrote: PK Can anyone point me in any direction on this please. PK The store on our web site, fortunately a CF based product, is run by another PK business area

Re: CFX not allowed

2002-10-10 Thread Jon Hall
82332000 PK m: 0418 806 166 PK ** PK -Original Message- PK From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] PK Sent: Friday, 11 October 2002 10:08 AM PK To: CF-Talk PK Subject: Re: CFX not allowed PK Which version of CF

RE: CFX not allowed

2002-10-10 Thread Parker, Kevin
: Re: CFX not allowed Then I'll stick with Jared's recommendations. Shelling out using cfexecute (free), or use a zip com object (not free), like the one from Xceed, would be the easiest way. Although...the real issue is that you are on a shared host who is restricting you. Why not move

RE: CFX not allowed

2002-10-10 Thread Tilbrook, Peter
Subject: RE: CFX not allowed Thanks Jon - dedicated was my immediate reaction when they told me the news but when I told the business area they'd have to fund it because I wasn't funded for it, they suggested we look for some other options first. I did canvass MX with the developer on the chance it did

RE: CFX not allowed

2002-10-10 Thread Jared Clinton
To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFX not allowed Thanks Jon - dedicated was my immediate reaction when they told me the news but when I told the business area they'd have to fund it because I wasn't funded for it, they suggested we look for some other options first. I did canvass MX with the developer

RE: CFX not allowed

2002-10-10 Thread Tilbrook, Peter
. Until then I'm not really doing anything in MX I haven't done in previous versions. Cheers! -Original Message- From: Jared Clinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 11 October 2002 1:53 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFX not allowed Peter, Mr. Parker wouldn't need to use a CFX