Re: Compatibility problem bet. Access and MSSQL

2004-04-25 Thread Claude Schneegans
I presume you want to have it so that it returns 1 or true when page2.dateMaj is greater than page1.dateMaj Sure, this is standard SQL: in a SELECT Value _expression_,... a value _expression_ can be a column name, a function or any combination in an _expression_. If the _expression_ is boolean,

RE: Compatibility problem bet. Access and MSSQL

2004-04-25 Thread Philip Arnold
From: Claude Schneegans Sure, this is standard SQL: in a SELECT Value _expression_,... a value _expression_ can be a column name, a function or any combination in an _expression_. If the _expression_ is boolean, the column should contain true, false or null. This works in Access, not

RE: Compatibility problem bet. Access and MSSQL

2004-04-25 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Philip Arnold said: From: Claude Schneegans Sure, this is standard SQL: in a SELECT Value _expression_,... a value _expression_ can be a column name, a function or any combination in an _expression_. If the _expression_ is boolean, the column should contain true, false or null. This works

RE: Compatibility problem bet. Access and MSSQL

2004-04-25 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Jochem van Dieten said: Philip Arnold said: And in the opposite, because NULL is a different state, you can't treat it like 1 or 0, so you have to do: WHERE prov is NULL or prov = 0 WHERE NOT prov IS NULL OR prov = FALSE Obviously the NOT is not needed here. Jochem [Todays Threads]

RE: Compatibility problem bet. Access and MSSQL

2004-04-25 Thread Philip Arnold
From: Jochem van Dieten WHERE prov = TRUE. WHERE NOT prov IS NULL OR prov = FALSE SQL Server 2000 doesn't understand TRUE or FALSE - it thinks they are a column reference - booleans are 1 or 0 This specific case is not a matter of being too used to Access' tricks, this is a matter of

RE: Compatibility problem bet. Access and MSSQL

2004-04-25 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Philip Arnold said: From: Jochem van Dieten WHERE prov = TRUE. WHERE NOT prov IS NULL OR prov = FALSE SQL Server 2000 doesn't understand TRUE or FALSE - it thinks they are a column reference - booleans are 1 or 0 http://register.microsoft.com/mswish/suggestion.asp This specific case is

RE: Compatibility problem bet. Access and MSSQL

2004-04-24 Thread Philip Arnold
From: Claude Schneegans I'm not too familiar with MSSQL, can someone tell me what would be the equivalent for the line page2.dateMaj page1.dateMaj AS modif and possibly an alternative that would work in both cases? What's it meant to return? I presume you want to have it so that it

Re: Compatibility problem bet. Access and MSSQL

2004-04-24 Thread Claude Schneegans
Forget it, I managed to find how to use the DATEDIFF function. -- ___ See some cool custom tags here: http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. [Todays Threads] [This Message]