RE: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-17 Thread James Smith
OK, fixed it. I had missed the mapping for "*.xml/*" as I thought this was for websafe stuff only and as this xml is not being passed any url vars in any format I had just left it off. Adding it fixed the problem. -- Jay ~| In

RE: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-17 Thread James Smith
> Did you restart IIS? It isn't actually required for this but yes I did, as I said, IIS is handing the file off to CF just fine, it is CF that is then throwing the error. -- Jay ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Up

RE: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread Christine Davis
Here's a tech note on configuring MX7 to use custom file extensions. http://www.talkingtree.com/blog/index.cfm/2006/2/17/CF-Custom-File-Exten sions Thanks! Christine Davis ColdFusion Lead Nations Technical Services Prairie Village, KS 913-748-8044 ext 4703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message

Re: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread Chris Hayes
- Original Message - From: "James Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 3:24 PM Subject: RE: Convincing CF to process xml files >> Any chance you're using Apache? This would be a perfect >> exercise for

Re: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread Rob Wilkerson
On 10/16/06, James Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any chance you're using Apache? This would be a perfect > > exercise for mod_rewrite. If not, maybe one of the IIS > > implementations. Any of those should be able to handle it. > > IIS is passing the file over to CF but CF is then refusing

RE: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread James Smith
> Any chance you're using Apache? This would be a perfect > exercise for mod_rewrite. If not, maybe one of the IIS > implementations. Any of those should be able to handle it. IIS is passing the file over to CF but CF is then refusing to do anything with it. > This is almost certainly my own

RE: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread James Smith
> >> Maybe I'm missing something here, but why does CF have to > >> process this file? Why not write the XML file to your web > >> root (or any other URI-accessible location) and then let the > >> web server handle it? > > > > Because it has to be dynamic... > > > > > Man you're locked into a me

Re: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread Chris Hayes
- Original Message - From: "James Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Maybe I'm missing something here, but why does CF have to >> process this file? Why not write the XML file to your web >> root (or any other URI-accessible location) and then let the >> web server handle it? > > Because it

Re: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread Rob Wilkerson
On 10/16/06, James Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why does it "have" to be a .xml document? If it is a .cfm and > > it is "strict" > > or "transitional" then CF will run the code. What does the > > the extention matter? > > Because, as I said, it is providing information to a third party, and

RE: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread Ben Nadel
: James Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 9:48 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Convincing CF to process xml files > Can you fake them out and do something like: > > Index.cfm/example.xml > > Which should call the index.cfm page and you can use example.xml

RE: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread James Smith
> Can you fake them out and do something like: > > Index.cfm/example.xml > > Which should call the index.cfm page and you can use > example.xml as the query string?? I had considered that but they require it in the root it absolutely must be in the format http://www.example.com/example.xml I ca

RE: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread Ben Nadel
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 9:26 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Convincing CF to process xml files > Why does it "have" to be a .xml document? If it is a .cfm and it is > "strict" > or "transitional" then CF will run the code

RE: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread James Smith
> Why does it "have" to be a .xml document? If it is a .cfm and > it is "strict" > or "transitional" then CF will run the code. What does the > the extention matter? Because, as I said, it is providing information to a third party, and they require the .xml

Re: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread Doug Brown
lk" Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 7:12 AM Subject: RE: Convincing CF to process xml files > > Maybe I'm missing something here, but why does CF have to > > process this file? Why not write the XML file to your web > > root (or any other URI-accessible locati

RE: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread James Smith
> Maybe I'm missing something here, but why does CF have to > process this file? Why not write the XML file to your web > root (or any other URI-accessible location) and then let the > web server handle it? Because it has to be dynamic... ~

Re: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread Rob Wilkerson
Maybe I'm missing something here, but why does CF have to process this file? Why not write the XML file to your web root (or any other URI-accessible location) and then let the web server handle it? -- Rob Wilkerson On 10/16/06, James Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't know anything

RE: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread James Smith
> I don't know anything about IIS... But perhaps you can "hack > it" by including the xml file and thereby forcing CF to > execute it. CF will execute any file that is included no > matter what type: Won't help, I need to produce a file on my server with cf for remote viewing, but the url must

RE: Convincing CF to process xml files

2006-10-16 Thread Ben Nadel
James, I don't know anything about IIS... But perhaps you can "hack it" by including the xml file and thereby forcing CF to execute it. CF will execute any file that is included no matter what type: http://www.bennadel.com/index.cfm?dax=blog:250.view Cheers, Ben .. Ben Nade