RE: DNS Auto Failover (was: CFMX and ClusterCATS?)

2003-10-24 Thread cf-talk
October 24, 2003 11:13 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: DNS Auto Failover (was: CFMX and ClusterCATS?) A, I see, ok that's a pretty good idea actually. Other than being slightly slower than load balancing it's not a bad idea. I can't imagine a server being down for 20 minutes though

Re: DNS Auto Failover (was: CFMX and ClusterCATS?)

2003-10-24 Thread Joshua Miller
A, I see, ok that's a pretty good idea actually. Other than being slightly slower than load balancing it's not a bad idea. I can't imagine a server being down for 20 minutes though, my boss would have shot me long before the DNS picked up for the other box. On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 13:56, cf-tal