res with 3 others at the U-Save Senior Center.)
-Original Message-
From: Nat Papovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2000 1:49 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Documentation System for Cold Fusion
LOL,
That's horrible Hal. You shouldn't
Yes,
Hal's original FuseDoc syntax has two main aspects:
1. The --> notation for attribute specification; and
2. The high-level FuseDoc header syntax, which codes Responsibilities,
Author, Attributes in a special order and manner.
Now I like part 1, the attributes specification notation very
ost no communication was required, as the coders understood how
Fusedoc worked and the fusestub contained all the info they needed to create
the code.
Can we improve on this? If so, I welcome ideas.
-----Original Message-
From: John Foulds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 25,
I would be interested in playing with Lee's version of this tool.
DC
- Original Message -
From: "Lee Borkman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 19:30
Subject: Re: Documentation System for
Hi John,
My intention here is to devise a documentation syntax that will be applicable
to ALL ColdFusion development, not just FuseBox. I personally love FuseBox,
but it has its detractors.
My feeling was that the original FuseDoc header used by Hal was too
inflexible. I wanted to add other ki
OTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Documentation System for Cold Fusion
>
>
> http://www.cfm-resources.com/members/cfdoc/syntax.htm
>
> returns 404
>
> ~Justin
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Fusebox" <
http://www.cfm-resources.com/members/cfdoc/syntax.htm
returns 404
~Justin
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cf-Talk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 12:25 PM
Subject: Documentation System for Cold Fusi
7 matches
Mail list logo
