On 10/14/02 10:00 AM, "Benoit Hediard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
..
>
> I recommand you not to empty the noise words files, you'll loose some great
> capabilities of full-text search.
> For example, if someone search for a letter/number or a common word ('the',
> 'or'...), those words should be i
great - thanks Benoit - I'll take all this on board and re-assess
-Original Message-
From: Benoit Hediard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 October 2002 18:00
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Full Text Indexs
The noise word file used is the one corresponding to the language you
spec
dy Ewings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : lundi 14 octobre 2002 17:18
À : CF-Talk
Objet : RE: Full Text Indexs
this doesn't appear to be the case here. "After eight" still throws an
error as "after" is reserved. eight however is ok. I have checked the
noise.eng fil
ish one
-Original Message-
From: Benoit Hediard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 October 2002 18:08
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Full Text Indexs
It should only throw an error if all the search words are defined in the
noise words file.
For example :
"The" will throw an error,
&qu
contains(DESCRIPTION_NEWS,'"#arguments.Text#"'))
Benoit Hediard
www.benorama.com
-Message d'origine-
De : Andy Ewings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2002 18:41
À : CF-Talk
Objet : RE: Full Text Indexs
Hi
We tried this but it did
Hi
We tried this but it didn't seem to work. We only changed the english one.
When we search on these key words it still throws an ODBC error. Any ideas?
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Benoit Hediard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 October 2002 13:23
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE:
6 matches
Mail list logo