CF can process multiple requests at one time, if that's what you mean. Just
have a cron job that makes a separate request for each sattellite, and CF
will process them all.
However, before you go down this road too far, this is MUCH better handled
with the database itself. I don't know what DB y
launch your sites using a programmatic call to cfschedule writing for
a once only task using action="" will make all of the
tasks run in seperate threads and at the same time...
Toby
Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 10:44:18 AM, you wrote:
NB> We are synchronizing DB's for multiple Web sites by having
Not sure I understand you 100%. Could you set up a scheduled event that
would become active at say 3AM and continue to call the Synch.cfm template
every 1 minute. The synch template would query a local DB that contains a
list of satellite sites and mark them off as 'INPROGRESS' and then
'COMPLE
Toby,
I understand your approach is to have each site triggering is own update
events. Although this would work the downside to our particular application
is, for several reasons to involve to address here, we need to keep timing
originating from the master.
Correct me if I have misunderstood
Brook,
That is basically what we are currently doing, i.e., a serial approach. The
system will work
but when Internet traffic becomes sluggish we start experiencing too many
pending events
and this results in performance degradation. A parallel approach would
reduce the seriousness
of the probl
Barney,
Thanks and this sounds like what we are looking for.
Nick
At 05:50 PM 3/23/2004, you wrote:
>CF can process multiple requests at one time, if that's what you mean. Just
>have a cron job that makes a separate request for each sattellite, and CF
>will process them all.
>
>However, before
Nick Baker wrote:
> That is basically what we are currently doing, i.e., a serial approach. The
> system will work
> but when Internet traffic becomes sluggish we start experiencing too many
> pending events
> and this results in performance degradation. A parallel approach would
> reduce the se
--Original Message-
From: Geoff Bowers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 1:19 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Is Parallel Processing Possible With CF?
Nick Baker wrote:
> That is basically what we are currently doing, i.e., a serial approach. The
> system will work
>
On Wednesday 24 Mar 2004 13:15 pm, Bill Grover wrote:
> each frame be processed as a different request causing CF to process them
> in parallel? __
It would.
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
Tel: +44(0)1749 834997
email: [EMAIL
Tom, are you getting two copies of every single message sent to this list or
am I succintly targeted by the arseholes of the world to be pushed to the
limit and say GTFOOH!?
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
On Wednesday 24 Mar 2004 13:46 pm, Peter Tilbrook wrote:
> Tom, are you getting two copies of every single message sent to this list
Nope.
Maybe you are sub'ed with two different address ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
Tel: +44(0)1749 834997
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BlueFinge
11 matches
Mail list logo
