Re: J2EE Session Sharing without Cluster? <-- more frustration

2005-06-23 Thread Adrocknaphobia
There are plenty of pros that come along with a cluster. Namely speed, high-availability and ease of patch management. -Adam On 6/23/05, jacksonj @ calib. com jacksonj @ calib. com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The more I know about having a farm of servers, the more worried I get > > about them

Re: J2EE Session Sharing without Cluster? <-- more frustration

2005-06-23 Thread jacksonj
> The more I know about having a farm of servers, the more worried I get > about them: > > Farm Cons: > * No way to sync the global scopes (Application, Server) > * No CFCs in session scope (Has this changed in CFMX7? Guess I can > look it up.) > * Only native way to do session sharing is

RE: J2EE Session Sharing without Cluster? <-- more frustration

2005-06-22 Thread Dave Watts
> * No CFCs in session scope (Has this changed in CFMX7? Guess > I can look it up.) I'm pretty sure that hasn't changed. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washingto

Re: J2EE Session Sharing without Cluster? <-- more frustration

2005-06-22 Thread jacksonj
>I actually have session sharing off now, using sticky sessions. Yeah, it was >pretty kewl when I had it enabled. The issue we had was with the charting >engine and we had one app where the developer stored CFCs in the session >scope. The charting engine will not work with session sharing on and

Re: J2EE Session Sharing without Cluster? <-- more frustration

2005-06-22 Thread Douglas Knudsen
I actually have session sharing off now, using sticky sessions. Yeah, it was pretty kewl when I had it enabled. The issue we had was with the charting engine and we had one app where the developer stored CFCs in the session scope. The charting engine will not work with session sharing on and sti

Re: J2EE Session Sharing without Cluster? <-- more frustration

2005-06-22 Thread jacksonj
>by CFMX cluster you are speaking of SOFTWARE based clustering in JRun, not a >load balancer correct? Try this code below, it will tell you what instance >you are on. I use this. Its a real PITA though to make sure you are on >instance foo or goo. > > > > >JRun Server Name: #servername#Now, ano

Re: J2EE Session Sharing without Cluster? <-- more frustration

2005-06-22 Thread Douglas Knudsen
by CFMX cluster you are speaking of SOFTWARE based clustering in JRun, not a load balancer correct? Try this code below, it will tell you what instance you are on. I use this. Its a real PITA though to make sure you are on instance foo or goo. Untitled JRun Server Name: #servername#