hmm... true. good point. is there any chance you can post the full
rendered html to nomorepasting.com so i can take it for a spin locally?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
> I don't think so, this works in FF, you'd think it would balk at that..
> but I'll check again.
>
>
Paste the whole page/code in question on pastebin so we can see the whole
thing
http://pastebin.com/
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Scott Stewart wrote:
> I don't think so, this works in FF, you'd think it would balk at that..
> but I'll check again.
>
> Charlie Griefer wrote:
> > do you have
[charlie.grie...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 12:48 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Javascript compatibility question
do you have multiple elements on the page with the same ID?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
> tried that, and no love...
>
> Charlie Grie
I don't think so, this works in FF, you'd think it would balk at that..
but I'll check again.
Charlie Griefer wrote:
> do you have multiple elements on the page with the same ID?
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
>
>
>> tried that, and no love...
>>
>> Charlie Griefer w
do you have multiple elements on the page with the same ID?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
> tried that, and no love...
>
> Charlie Griefer wrote:
> > I think what Adrian's getting at is your reference to the elements should
> be
> > document.getElementById('foo'), not docu
Yeah, what Charlie said :OD
> -Original Message-
> From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:charlie.grie...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 13 January 2009 17:11
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: Re: Javascript compatibility question
>
> I think what Adrian's getting at is your reference t
tried that, and no love...
Charlie Griefer wrote:
> I think what Adrian's getting at is your reference to the elements should be
> document.getElementById('foo'), not document.form1.getElementById('foo').
> can you give that a shot?
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
>
>
I think what Adrian's getting at is your reference to the elements should be
document.getElementById('foo'), not document.form1.getElementById('foo').
can you give that a shot?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
> getElementById() is a javascript function that finds a specified
>>getElementById() is a javascript function that finds a specified element
on a page it can be a form or page element.
At least in IE, this methods applies only to the document object.
see:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-DOM-Level-1-2929/level-one-html.html#ID-40002357
I'm surprised it works f
jQuery instead?
>
> Adrian
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:saste...@email.unc.edu]
>> Sent: 13 January 2009 16:51
>> To: cf-talk
>> Subject: Re: Javascript compatibility question
>>
>> getElementById() is a ja
Yup, I know, but is there a method form.getElementByID()? I've only ever
used it in document.
Fancy trying jQuery instead?
Adrian
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:saste...@email.unc.edu]
> Sent: 13 January 2009 16:51
> To: cf-talk
> Sub
getElementById() is a javascript function that finds a specified element
on a page it can be a form or page element.
in this case I'm trying to disable/enable radio buttons.
Adrian Lynch wrote:
> Is getElementById a method of a form?
>
> Shouldn't it just be document.getElementById()?
>
> Adrian
Try the syntax of one of the following examples:
document.form1.pre_absent.disabled = true;
document.getElementById("pre_absent").disabled = true;
HTH
Steve
From: Scott Stewart [saste...@email.unc.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:29 AM
To: cf-talk
Is getElementById a method of a form?
Shouldn't it just be document.getElementById()?
Adrian
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:saste...@email.unc.edu]
> Sent: 13 January 2009 16:30
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: Javascript compatibility question
>
> Hey all,
>
> I'm trying t
Joe:
Can you throw an alert in the first line of the function?
first alert a static value just to see if the function's getting called at
all:
function switchLocation(loc) {
alert('foo');
...
}
then try alerting the 'loc' value:
function switchLocation(loc) {
alert(loc);
...
1) did you copy/paste this code? You're calling swithLocation(), but
the function name is switchLocation() :)
didnt paste the code.. just wrote it out, its working fine for all lastest
versions of IE and Netscape.
2) instead of document.forms[0].myList.value, pass the following
argument: this.op
Any close to current version of AOL that would work on Win95 would have
used the IE browser control as it's main browser window, and would have
used the control of whichever version of IE is loaded on the system. If
the user never did a windows update (and quite probably never has or
could) the
2 things:
1) did you copy/paste this code? You're calling swithLocation(), but
the function name is switchLocation() :)
2) instead of document.forms[0].myList.value, pass the following
argument: this.options[this.selectedIndex].value
In a , the options are an array to JS. selectedIndex is the
c
prolly cos it was netscape based. remember back in those days tryin to code for both NS and IE was a nightmare
- Original Message -
From: Joe Eugene
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 12:13 AM
Subject: _javascript_ Compatibility
Does anybody know why this would Not
19 matches
Mail list logo