This one is driving me nuts and I have seen the same results on a few
different MX installations now. Anyone know the URL to report a bug to
Macromedia I cant' believe no one else has run into this. It happens
on a couple different scripts of mine, re-producible on a few
different MX installations
> This one is driving me nuts and I have seen the same results
> on a few different MX installations now. Anyone know the URL
> to report a bug to Macromedia I cant' believe no one else has
> run into this. It happens on a couple different scripts of
> mine, re-producible on a few different MX
Look more closely at the output of CF 5 with a binary file viewing
tool. Check to see if for every chr(10) there's also a chr(13) before
or after the chr(10). Then do the same for the MX output. I'm guessing
CF 5 is automatically outputting a chr(13) with every chr(10) whereas
MX is not.
~
Bingo Dave, that was it. On CF5 and previous version, if memory serves
me correctly, if you used both 10 & 13, it created an additional line,
and now it works properly. I think the order has to be 13 first and
then 10.
Thanks much. After upgrading a client, all of my text files that
scheduled sc
Chris,
Based on the findings from Dave's post, I think you would be right. Do
you know of any binary file viewing tools? I know Norton Utilities had
one a long time ago, but not sure of current options. I could google
it but if you have experience with any, let me know.
Dan
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005
I like ultraedit. $40.00 (www.ultraedit.com)
Jerry Johnson
Web Developer
Dolan Media Company
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/22/05 04:39PM >>>
Chris,
Based on the findings from Dave's post, I think you would be right. Do
you know of any binary file viewing tools? I know Norton Utilities had
one a long
Rookie! ;o)
Rey...
- Original Message -
From: "Dan O'Keefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: MX & CHR(10)
> Bingo Dave, that was it. On CF5 and previous version, if memory serves
> m
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:38:59 -0500, Jerry Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like ultraedit. $40.00 (www.ultraedit.com)
I use ultraedit as well. There are some plugins for the free
programmers editor jedit (jedit.org). I haven't used it, but I hear
it's good.
~
> Based on the findings from Dave's post, I think you would be
> right. Do you know of any binary file viewing tools? I know
> Norton Utilities had one a long time ago, but not sure of
> current options. I could google it but if you have experience
> with any, let me know.
Ultraedit is very ni
Notepad 2 or SciTE...
Both free, both google-able... both quite nice.
Notepad2: http://www.flos-freeware.ch/np2faq.html
MOST excellent and really quite free... it's a hobby project for some
dude in Czechoslovakia. I emailed him a question once, and he got me
an answer in 24 hours. Not bad for a
pka-Hauer - CMG, LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 3:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: MX & CHR(10)
Notepad 2 or SciTE...
Both free, both google-able... both quite nice.
Notepad2: http://www.flos-freeware.ch/np2faq.html
MOST excellent and really quite free...
That could be an ASCII/BINARY problem with notepad.
As for your chr() problem itself.. have you tried changing your carriage return?
There's "#chr(13)#" or "#chr(13)##chr(10)#" or the solid "
" (entering a return yourself).
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:30:44 -0500, Dan O'Keefe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
> Has anyone noticed a difference in the way this function works
> in MX? I upgraded a CF 5 server to MX and now my text files that
> I have always written out with chr(10) are not formatted
> properly and a control code is visible when viewing the file
> in notepad.
On Windows, you use two co
I would think not, but in my case, the difference before and after
upgrading is obvious. Going to dig a little more.
Dan
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:36:07 -0500, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Has anyone noticed a difference in the way this function works
> > in MX? I upgraded a CF 5 server
a file generated by CF5 using #chr(10)# displays perfectly in notepad,
and MX does not. Guess I will try it on another MX box and see if I
can reporduce it.
Dan
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:17:44 -0600, Tony Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That could be an ASCII/BINARY problem with notepad.
>
> As
15 matches
Mail list logo
