RE: Macromedia TechNote on Database Performance

2003-01-16 Thread Chris Alvarado
hero." -Original Message- From: Joshua Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:39 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Macromedia TechNote on Database Performance But that doesn't work when you do: Query#ID#.RecordCount I can get it to generate the query, just not c

RE: Macromedia TechNote on Database Performance

2003-01-16 Thread Joshua Miller
EMAIL PROTECTED] * -Original Message- From: paul smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 6:02 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Macromedia TechNote on Database Performance QUERY="MyQuery#ID#" best, paul At 05:04 PM 1/16/03 -0500, you wrote: >I'm having luck jus

RE: Macromedia TechNote on Database Performance

2003-01-16 Thread paul smith
QUERY="MyQuery#ID#" best, paul At 05:04 PM 1/16/03 -0500, you wrote: >I'm having luck just changing some queries to Stored Proceedures ... I'd >like to use caching, but I can't figure out a way to specify dynamic >query names.

Re: Macromedia TechNote on Database Performance

2003-01-16 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Joshua Miller wrote: > > --- "For instance, the SELECT MAX(ID) + 1 -> INSERT trick to get the > next > value for a primary key technically requires a serializable isolation > level." > > That seems like a bad idea anyway, wouldn't it be possible for someone > to write to the database between yo

Re: Macromedia TechNote on Database Performance

2003-01-16 Thread Christian Cantrell
ECTED] > *** > * > ***** > > > -Original Message- > From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:15 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Macromedia TechN

RE: Macromedia TechNote on Database Performance

2003-01-16 Thread Joshua Miller
immediately and advise us by return e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * -Original Message- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:04 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Macromedia TechNote on Database Performance Joshua Miller wrote: > D

RE: Macromedia TechNote on Database Performance

2003-01-16 Thread Joshua Miller
us by return e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * -Original Message- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:15 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Macromedia TechNote on Database Performance > Does anyone hav

Re: Macromedia TechNote on Database Performance

2003-01-16 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Joshua Miller wrote: > Does anyone have any information on changing the Isolation Level on MS > SQL Server 2000 as referenced in: > http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/releasenotes/mx/releasenote > s_mx.html#perf > > Does this have much impact on performance? If so, how do I do it? There

Re: Macromedia TechNote on Database Performance

2003-01-16 Thread Adam Churvis
> Does anyone have any information on changing the Isolation Level on MS > SQL Server 2000 as referenced in: > http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/releasenotes/mx/releasenote > s_mx.html#perf Everyone, please be very careful about this! You should understand precisely what the implicatio

RE: Macromedia TechNote on Database Performance

2003-01-16 Thread Dave Watts
> Does anyone have any information on changing the Isolation > Level on MS SQL Server 2000 as referenced in: > http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/releasenotes/mx/r > eleasenotes_mx.html#perf > > Does this have much impact on performance? If so, how do I > do it? There is no setting in

RE: Macromedia TechNote on Database Performance

2003-01-16 Thread Debbie Dickerson
I think that was actually supposed to be pulled out of the docs. Here's what I was told regarding that setting: "It turns out that the isolation level gain is nearly negligible, and can degrade performance in some cases...found after CFMX Server shipped". If you did want to try it in your envir