Tell me if I'm wrong, but doesn't displaying the profanity in this
notification undermine the silly censorship system in the first place?
whats the point?
-Original Message-
From: Postmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Mail D
Didn't the autoreply email contain the very word that caused the
original to be rejected -- Now, if Michael had an auto reply...
Dick
On Monday, August 26, 2002, at 02:01 PM, Everett, Al wrote:
> Has it really come to this?
>
> I mean, I'm the strongest proponent for civil discourse and good
al Message-
From: Everett, Al [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Mail Delivery Status Notification
Has it really come to this?
I mean, I'm the strongest proponent for civil discourse and good manners
this side of Judith Martin, but this is
Please do not respond to this or to the original post. It was an automated response
and I've emailed the postmaster of that domain about it. I do not allow automated
responses like this or vacation notices on the list as it is way off topic and
wasteful.
Again, please do not reply to this
Has it really come to this?
I mean, I'm the strongest proponent for civil discourse and good manners
this side of Judith Martin, but this is ridiculous. One presumes that when
one is gainfully employed that one will not be overly harmed by one
profanity in an otherwise content-full message.
Some
5 matches
Mail list logo
